From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17BC63858C98 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:11:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 17BC63858C98 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 17BC63858C98 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710947476; cv=none; b=YYC5T1pRm9s9QIFcv8IBHrT3eIhWFSkmkY5U7HdMaLxvWAzNdZlhTvSZ+O8fsU1BoqJWdyEZxuCQOu2KtNfzblvucMtXgCVAhfc91sDI9ZgKqypiI9kYFvOFF1CNz69t48ZtFqZCxG+9jK1OdYPZzoX5TPz0lXiaDHCyEZ+UGs8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710947476; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nWweYlR8HschiGnAXzfLS5KJMUEfGAKqcDoGDmpeK9c=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=G2KdOpe3NELu7IX6TFpN+xs8841Hgrb6/To+jw1RtzB8KQvZhHOnnAJXAnJ8ObXU0p/lZ1hwB9BZ/c7goNQSlA74gz1CfMh3VJxTMCghN/iFzO+na7zcJHKFTc1jP6GL8C3tPGD2iOqbQQft+tuUok9qW9xbeG84MUlaUCiATJI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1710947465; bh=nWweYlR8HschiGnAXzfLS5KJMUEfGAKqcDoGDmpeK9c=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=u/K0nO35G0Pf5nBbYIgwKxlXMOfHMySOkIM9sZp0ft125m3q/MMvNHwVfdbTEnu3w enNOc1+Y/7To27bFeJpDNqNu/mX+lHrCFVenrc+f6qbgbl9MJwUB4D+hDQKrVWlHYD a/GBus3L041F4959bF++mjhIS1z/DtRFU7F8wqoM= Received: from [172.16.0.192] (192-222-143-198.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.143.198]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38CB81E030; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:11:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:11:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC] add regenerate Makefile target To: Christophe Lyon , Tom Tromey Cc: Eric Gallager , binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20240313080237.1143034-1-christophe.lyon@linaro.org> <1eb529f2-3842-4090-a8e2-f713a28f2394@simark.ca> <87edcbk1x3.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Language: fr From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 3/18/24 13:28, Christophe Lyon via Gdb wrote: > I'm not up-to-date with gdb's policy about patches: are they supposed > to be posted with or without the regenerated parts included? > IIUC they are not included in patch submissions for binutils and gcc, > which makes the pre-commit CI miss some patches. We post the patches with the regenerated parts. Simon