From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FBAD3858410 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 18:39:17 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0FBAD3858410 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id 20so14173953pgc.5 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 11:39:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kJ1e+qgttMKQYyVp27aQ7cXcFRIrTQIzSiq/2unwPZM=; b=csLouUhF3vk/sQKtsMWnl8y8yqUOBzLnZIhfMYpAPOPnvbGyITcMWHvLbEbQwswCEU 3xFboVJrCBHpSux0aOA6XUjBNLUbS34k5UkX2YdToL1XcPWVilMfbOfYKIXyLHmpaOrf GgEffipGrstrlf2/EpiQsRsA6Z9VEvlrvFSVLlws3ueoElvyIJz4FN47tDq6fgQiKFcB l1qpHaUh8DJtO2Vwi14KyE+PVhAcb4/OB0grPi+0eNmnJ37ElX7uuOSVch0sabxyJ5B8 RLh1ZtgG+qxn9wVqIuSHG+Q5px3UB/7L2M/hl961b7N+FrIffStyM+fzT7WXASmuCrRU onrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kJ1e+qgttMKQYyVp27aQ7cXcFRIrTQIzSiq/2unwPZM=; b=tJaqiQ11onpNANRFjKH6K7G75BVRvnaEkjxI0zl742dB14Ar+VAiuzkHHwgRchAbHP WpQDoVDrFyYV0EhjTc1YNQdtIDE1c49JMYhWj2tVwh1KDxlLlXEuBQssZT1DYbqeXzc0 gmhnqBxmr/Qvu5QgdwqeLGlMUoDSphavcjYZRnNw0kRMSaHdyKOs0B/WPvUKeTYx6VUR KrgXpVkiVCLfu0vCAh2DmIuTXXY5gxcCXj+ubkKaK2pInD2hmXm6f4d1lY3K5kd5hlR0 q+SBjp4eybAJ7Aa/8gT+rBATQm0m75I5at2rntvStaIGhBUbaj3+4e6MVkDL/ijPOkFV bzxA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1zh3KuWbcThHxBpMfG3GObN4UYBl+aNTOjmcUEZl+NvN85nCei 7fc81tl2vLpZfoQQhuipJq3FHjRmh4k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM41DBfMX7afif59UelSbX6Yvv0a7p39RAei6zKR36MY9mx4OSqZJGk9dB/cD0ZWXBpYrri0Gw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6a87:0:b0:46f:8fcc:de1a with SMTP id f129-20020a636a87000000b0046f8fccde1amr15013253pgc.429.1667327955706; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 11:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:681:8600:13d0::f0a? ([2601:681:8600:13d0::f0a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a10-20020aa78e8a000000b0056281da3bcbsm7055342pfr.149.2022.11.01.11.39.14 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Nov 2022 11:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 12:39:13 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: Fwd: Request easy bug fix Content-Language: en-US To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <27d907087416c330d59ce78dce522fd26a5d712e.camel@redhat.com> From: Jeff Law In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 10/30/22 09:01, Baruch Burstein via Gcc wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 5:20 PM Jonathan Wakely > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 13:58, David Malcolm wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 12:55 +0000, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: >>>> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 12:34, Baruch Burstein via Gcc < >>>> gcc@gcc.gnu.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I hope it is not inappropriate to call attention to a specific bug. >>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=85487. >> > > > Clang and the MSVC compiler both ignore any tokens after the pragma, so >> that seems good enough for GCC too: >> >> https://godbolt.org/z/norv947a5 >> >> > I am sorry for posting this again, but to the best of my understanding of > the thread at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=85487, the > patch already exists (I am not sure where), and was not merged to GCC 12 > only because I called attention to it too late in the dev cycle, so I am > trying to get this in earlier for GCC 13. It is literally a "do-nothing" > patch. Just a note, I won't object if someone wants to move this forward. jeff