From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raja R Harinath To: egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: Desire gcc option to skip warnings in standard headers Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 20:15:00 -0000 Message-id: References: X-SW-Source: 1998-07/msg00056.html Mumit Khan writes: > On Tue, 30 Jun 1998, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > > pragmas are generally frowned upon in gcc. You'll have a hard time > > convincing anyone to accept new ones. > > And for good reasons in most cases. However, what if the native API > requires it (especially if the native headers are unusable w/out it)? Isn't that what `fixincludes' is meant for. - Hari -- Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu "When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom "Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash