From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia@gmail.com>
To: "Stephane Hockenhull" <shockenhull@niceberg.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>,
"Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@false.org>,
"Joe Buck" <Joe.Buck@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de8d50360711271240o8227732y23a7a9578142257a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711271539.45293.shockenhull@niceberg.com>
On 11/27/07, Stephane Hockenhull <shockenhull@niceberg.com> wrote:
> no, it would not.
> because for one simple fact: COFF format lacks many features of ELF.
What features are missing? COFF is not used for Windows 32 anyways,
it is PE-COFF. I am just wondering what exactly is missing that you
think you need to go this route.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-27 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-26 19:00 why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-26 19:08 ` Joe Buck
2007-11-26 19:52 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-26 19:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-26 21:42 ` Joe Buck
2007-11-27 0:29 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-27 6:25 ` Joe Buck
2007-11-27 13:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-27 16:51 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-27 16:35 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-27 17:32 ` Dave Korn
2007-11-27 18:11 ` Dave Korn
2007-11-27 18:39 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-27 19:58 ` Dave Korn
2007-11-27 20:04 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2007-11-27 20:19 ` why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Dave Korn
2007-11-27 21:32 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-27 21:44 ` Andrew Pinski [this message]
2007-11-27 22:30 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-27 22:14 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-27 22:34 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-28 20:36 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-28 20:44 ` Dave Korn
2007-11-28 20:45 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-28 20:58 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2007-11-28 21:25 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-28 22:03 ` why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes ?andtemplates 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2007-11-28 23:17 ` why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Andrew Pinski
2007-11-29 0:08 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-28 23:25 ` Jonathan Wakely
2007-11-29 0:11 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-28 22:24 ` Stephane Hockenhull
2007-11-28 21:00 ` Dave Korn
2007-11-27 22:23 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de8d50360711271240o8227732y23a7a9578142257a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pinskia@gmail.com \
--cc=Joe.Buck@synopsys.com \
--cc=dave.korn@artimi.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=shockenhull@niceberg.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).