From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia@gmail.com>
To: "Ismail Dönmez" <ismail@pardus.org.tr>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Changes in C++ FE regarding pedwarns to be errors are harmful
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de8d50360801081444n67e45c83v6c108168a915f049@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801090037.31205.ismail@pardus.org.tr>
On 1/8/08, Ismail Dönmez <ismail@pardus.org.tr> wrote:
> Oh that clears up my confusion. So the right fix would be downgrading this
> redefinition problem to be pedwarn instead. But I see no point in creating a
> bug report if its just gonna be closed as invalid, so I hope we can discuss
> if its feasible to downgrade this error to be a pedwarn.
It is already a pedwarn. Just the C++ front-end enables pedwarn as
being errors by default and downgrades them as being warnings with
-fpermissive. This is the whole point of -fpermissive.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-08 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-08 21:27 Ismail Dönmez
2008-01-08 21:34 ` Joe Buck
2008-01-08 21:43 ` Richard Guenther
2008-01-08 21:44 ` Ismail Dönmez
2008-01-08 22:13 ` Andrew Pinski
2008-01-08 22:29 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2008-01-08 22:36 ` Ismail Dönmez
2008-01-08 22:45 ` Andrew Pinski [this message]
2008-01-09 14:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-09 15:38 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2008-01-09 15:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-08 22:51 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2008-01-08 23:02 ` Ismail Dönmez
2008-01-09 1:23 ` Ismail Dönmez
2008-01-09 2:25 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2008-01-09 16:47 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2008-01-09 18:11 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2008-01-09 18:18 ` Andrew Pinski
2008-01-09 18:21 ` Paolo Carlini
2008-01-09 19:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2008-01-11 17:06 ` Jason Merrill
2008-01-11 17:12 ` Joe Buck
2008-01-11 17:55 ` Mark Mitchell
2008-01-12 19:07 ` Jonathan Wakely
2008-01-12 19:50 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2008-01-13 3:28 ` Jonathan Wakely
2008-01-13 15:30 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2008-01-13 22:56 ` Jonathan Wakely
2008-01-14 2:04 ` Jonathan Wakely
2008-01-14 2:19 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2008-01-13 15:33 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2008-01-13 15:36 ` Ismail Dönmez
2008-01-13 16:09 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-01-13 16:10 ` Ismail Dönmez
2008-01-13 16:13 ` Richard Guenther
2008-01-13 16:41 ` Ismail Dönmez
2008-01-13 23:08 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2008-01-14 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-01-14 16:23 ` Ismail Dönmez
2008-01-13 16:43 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2008-01-13 16:45 ` Ismail Dönmez
2008-01-13 19:17 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de8d50360801081444n67e45c83v6c108168a915f049@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pinskia@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ismail@pardus.org.tr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).