From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18170 invoked by alias); 28 May 2005 20:23:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18131 invoked by uid 22791); 28 May 2005 20:23:15 -0000 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.193) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2005 20:23:15 +0000 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1950904wri for ; Sat, 28 May 2005 13:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.159.6 with SMTP id h6mr3719337wre; Sat, 28 May 2005 13:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.81.6 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2005 13:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 23:29:00 -0000 From: William Beebe Reply-To: William Beebe To: Scott Robert Ladd Subject: Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Cc: Uros Bizjak , gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4298A5B0.1020304@coyotegulch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42988B8C.2090905@kss-loka.si> <4298A5B0.1020304@coyotegulch.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg01553.txt.bz2 On 5/28/05, Scott Robert Ladd wrote: > Brainstorming there may be, but certain folk in the GCC community simply > like being annoying, perhaps to feed their own sense of self-importance. > It is quite possible to disagree with someone without be disagreeable, > as exemplified by Evandro Menezes recently. >=20 > ..Scott It's called polite constructive criticism. Unfortunately, the lack of civility when offering important judgement isn't limited to this newsgroup. For example, whenever I feel the temperature rising a bit too high, I just wonder over to the lkml and lurk awhile until I realize once more what wonderfully sainted individuals the gcc developers are.