public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Beebe <wbeebe@gmail.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0716e9f05052910475b5fc0fc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9Xl9gLN1w-B@khms.westfalen.de>

On 29 May 2005 11:37:00 +0200, Kai Henningsen <kaih@khms.westfalen.de> wrote:
> scott.ladd@coyotegulch.com (Scott Robert Ladd)  wrote on 28.05.05 in 
> > In my experience, people don't file Bugzilla reports because it feels
> > impersonal and unresponsive. The form is not very user-friendly (as in
> > friendly to users of GCC, not its developers.)
> 
> This is pretty much incomprehensible to me (NOT a gcc developer, but a gcc
> user - that is, a programmer).
> 
> "Feels impersonal"? And this is supposed to be a *problem* with a bug
> reporting system?!
> 
> We're not talking about a trouble ticket system for a matchmaking agency
> here, are we? I certainly don't expect technology in general to feel
> personal. And in fact I thought the problem with the mailing lists *was*
> that they got too personal.
> 
> Unresponsive? I thought the whole point was to avoid responses (in the
> mailing list)?
> 
> Sorry, but this really does not make any sense to me.
> 
> As for the user friendlyness of the forms, well, all I can say is that
> they're certainly not optimal, but they're at least in the upper 30% of
> forms in general one encounters on the web - and that includes non-
> technical stuff. In fact, forms for non-technical stuff are usually
> especially bad - presumably because the authors have less understanding of
> the technology involved.
> 
> MfG Kai

OK, then let me explain it to you. The problem with the GCC Bugzilla
reporting system is that it's a system that only other developers can
tolerate, let alone love. The entire GCC website (of which GCC
Bugzilla is a part) could be the poster child for why developers
should never be allowed to design user interfaces, especially web user
interfaces. I'm sure I'll get flamed for wanting style over substance
or about the proliferation of eye candy, but the GCC web site and it's
attendent support pages can only be charitably described as eye trash.
Yes, you can find the bug link if you read the main page long enough
and move down the page slowly enough, or if, like me, you fire up
Firefox's find and use that to go quickly to the bug link. But that's
beside the point. At the very least the design of the GCC web site
makes the whole project look like someone who has just discovered the
web and decided to build a few pages. And please don't harp on making
it standards compliant and viewable by every browser in existance.
There are plenty of well-designed and excellent sites that follow
those same rules. You just need to be willing to put in the effort to
look a little more professional and polished. And just to stir the pot
further, a web site is an important marketing tool. It's the first
thing that a lot of people will see when they go looking for help. If
you want to have more people participate, then make the tools more
inviting.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-29 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-28 17:10 Uros Bizjak
2005-05-28 23:02 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-28 23:28   ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-28 23:29   ` William Beebe
2005-05-29  4:47     ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-29 18:32   ` Kai Henningsen
2005-05-29 18:52     ` William Beebe [this message]
2005-05-29 19:24       ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? Russ Allbery
2005-05-30 16:32         ` William Beebe
2005-05-30 19:22           ` Russ Allbery
2005-05-30 15:35       ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Kai Henningsen
2005-05-31  3:50         ` chris jefferson
2005-05-31  5:56           ` Gary Funck
2005-05-31  6:04           ` Paul Brook
2005-05-30 15:39       ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-29  1:30 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-29 15:57   ` Giovanni Bajo
2005-05-29 18:05     ` Michael Veksler
2005-05-30 15:34       ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-30 15:48       ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-30 15:31         ` Vincent Lefevre
     [not found]       ` <26669933.1117479096256.JavaMail.root@dtm1eusosrv72.dtm.ops.eu.uu.net>
2005-05-30 21:17         ` Toon Moene
2005-05-31 11:24           ` Robert Dewar
2005-06-06 21:47             ` Laurent GUERBY
2005-06-06 23:23               ` Robert Dewar
2005-06-09  7:44                 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 12:51           ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 13:17             ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 13:44               ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 14:32                 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 15:10                   ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 15:58                     ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 16:53                       ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-31 17:03                         ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 18:40                           ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 19:28                             ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-05-31 23:30                               ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 18:35                         ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 17:44                       ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 20:11                         ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 23:53                           ` Vincent Lefevre
     [not found]                             ` <jefyw3jguf.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
     [not found]                               ` <20050531224258.GJ3541@ay.vinc17.org>
     [not found]                                 ` <jemzqb2eb2.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
2005-06-01  0:23                                   ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-06-01  8:42                                     ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 17:21                     ` Mike Stump
2005-05-31 17:44                       ` Dave Korn
2005-06-01  1:57                         ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-05-31 19:27                       ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 19:58                         ` Mike Stump
2005-05-31 23:40                           ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-06-01  5:59                             ` Alan Modra
2005-06-01  7:21                               ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-06-01 17:32                                 ` Mike Stump
2005-06-01 18:01                                   ` Daniel Berlin
2005-06-01 18:33                                     ` Mike Stump
2005-05-29 20:13     ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-05-29 20:18       ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-30 15:40   ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-30 15:31     ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-30 20:12     ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-30 20:13       ` Robert Dewar
2005-05-30 20:34         ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-30 20:46           ` Robert Dewar
2005-05-30 21:10             ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-31  9:11               ` Robert Dewar
2005-05-31 12:33             ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 12:48               ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-31 13:35                 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 14:08                 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-06-22 19:44     ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? Gerald Pfeifer
2005-05-29  7:33 ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Ross Smith
2005-05-29  7:51   ` Joe Buck
2005-05-29  9:56     ` R Hill
2005-05-30 17:03       ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? Zack Weinberg
2005-05-30 19:39         ` Gary Funck
2005-05-30 15:48   ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
2005-05-31  7:40     ` R Hill
2005-05-31 12:04       ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? Russ Allbery
2005-05-31 12:08         ` R Hill
2005-05-31 17:14         ` Dave Korn
2005-05-31 17:14           ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-31 17:43             ` Dave Korn
2005-05-31 19:18               ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-31 19:43                 ` Dave Korn
2005-05-31 17:22   ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Hugh Sasse
2005-05-29 12:54 ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-29 15:19   ` Michael Veksler
2005-05-29 15:38     ` Giovanni Bajo
2005-05-29 18:16       ` Michael Veksler
2005-05-30 16:07       ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-30 15:36         ` Michael Veksler
2005-05-30 15:28           ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-30 15:28           ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-29 17:23     ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-30 15:25     ` Joe Buck
2005-05-30 15:31     ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-30 15:43     ` Daniel Berlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e0716e9f05052910475b5fc0fc@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=wbeebe@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).