From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-195630-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 102776 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2018 20:07:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 102723 invoked by uid 89); 24 Mar 2018 20:07:07 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:391, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit
X-HELO: cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de
Received: from cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (HELO cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de) (89.1.8.213) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:07:05 +0000
Received: from cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de [89.1.8.201])	by cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA69C128E5;	Sat, 24 Mar 2018 21:07:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D631411DDB;	Sat, 24 Mar 2018 21:07:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [89.0.22.43] (helo=cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de)	by localhost with ESMTP (eXpurgate 4.1.9)	(envelope-from <v.reichelt@netcologne.de>)	id 5ab6afe6-029d-7f0000012729-7f000001ab03-1	for <multiple-recipients>; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 21:07:02 +0100
Received: from [192.168.178.26] (xdsl-89-0-22-43.netcologne.de [89.0.22.43])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;	Sat, 24 Mar 2018 21:07:01 +0100 (CET)
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
From: Volker Reichelt <v.reichelt@netcologne.de>
Subject: Errors in pairs
Message-ID: <e389e3ae-b576-eadd-5f3a-435df1c04841@netcologne.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:07:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00231.txt.bz2

Hi everybody,

while bug-hunting I noticed that we emit lots of erros in pairs in
check_final_overrider (cp/search.c), e.g.:

   error ("invalid covariant return type for %q+#D", overrider);
   error ("  overriding %q+#D", basefn);

I would expect the second line to be emitted as a note (using inform).
Is there a reason for this or should that be changed?

Regards,
Volker