From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADF243858417; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:10:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org ADF243858417 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B52F0210F2; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:10:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1640261433; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rB29ArC0+gYgB09ESwbTWzm29c83e+a7Q+33kOSDNm0=; b=vZkg717yCmYhWbOFmI5Kpc9RxW0sQjVOaFgCSojiuWI5kCMkdtXKu4uKktwtzWT4zUQ5B+ vYi8LgBsB15e24jMylMZPYh17haukPQBv4Lh9S4k7gPB2CirsVgRrgdGntb9N50BUwe2SH Q4K9kYAVro+npVtpvxea74PlyT0yl5w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1640261433; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rB29ArC0+gYgB09ESwbTWzm29c83e+a7Q+33kOSDNm0=; b=iMOrhRGfs9jgMhGoz7GoHCAREQghVUl1V4XEZdLzKMhwuO8OE/tzV811BiJIJy3FDzFLc6 Xe8ciEMHHRJqUICA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8198F13F15; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id FJEdHjlnxGGaPwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:10:33 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:10:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: New ThreadSanitizer runtime (v3) Content-Language: en-US To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: gcc , ro@gcc.gnu.org, Jakub Jelinek , =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= , Marco Elver , Alexander Potapenko References: <7506afec-035a-bf4f-1dd7-f022423f4627@suse.cz> <32f8b7ad-d6ae-3e7f-6372-212c21dbbe07@suse.cz> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:10:38 -0000 On 11/30/21 05:17, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 19:16, Martin Liška wrote: >> >> On 11/22/21 20:01, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>> I've already reverted the change. So I will include a fix into the next version. >>> Thanks for notifying. >> >> Hello. >> >> Am I correct that the patch set is installed again? Any near future plans for another >> revert of the patch? Do you think it's the right time to merge it to GCC? > > It has been re-landed at least twice since then :) > Well, I can't promise that it won't be reverted again. I obviously do > not want that. Hard to say. I need to send some follow up clean up > patches and I plan to wait till the end of the week (to avoid messy > multi commit reverts). > So if there are no deadlines to miss, I would suggest waiting until > the beginning of the next week. Hello. May I please ask about the status of TSANv3? Note we'll flip to stage4 stage in about 3 weeks and so I'm curious if we want to do one more merge from upstream? @Jakub: What do you think about it? Cheers, Martin