From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9761 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2005 16:08:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9315 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2005 16:08:33 -0000 Received: from bethe.phy.uc.edu (HELO bethe.phy.uc.edu) (129.137.4.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:08:33 +0000 Received: from [172.30.2.60] (zhivago.erc-wireless.uc.edu [172.30.2.60]) by bethe.phy.uc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5UG8RpT023751; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:08:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <27918F7A-CBBC-4657-AB29-3242BE6DF53D@apple.com> References: <6269B965-AF17-4FBD-B3ED-B1BA96936380@apple.com> <20050627195619.GA12102@redhat.com> <71AD0926-2DA8-4B55-828F-38A85155CC86@apple.com> <27918F7A-CBBC-4657-AB29-3242BE6DF53D@apple.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Henderson From: Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:08:00 -0000 To: fjahanian X-Spam-Score: -100 () USER_IN_WHITELIST X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg01310.txt.bz2 On Jun 30, 2005, at 12:05 PM, fjahanian wrote: > Bootstrapped and dejagnu tested on apple-x86-darwin and > apple-ppc-darwin. > > We also observed that on ppc, SPEC did not show any performance change > either way. On apple-x86-darwin 252.eon improved by 7% as expected, > with no noticeable change in other benchmarks. One caveat to all these > is that this may expose optimization bugs which were previously hidden > by inclusion of -fforce-mem. > > OK for check-in? > > - fariborz > > ChangeLog: > > 2005-06-30 Fariborz Jahanian > > * opts.c (decode_options): Don't set -fforce-mem with -O2 and > more. Please also update the docs in invoke.texi. Thanks, Andrew Pinski