From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-200952-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 105324 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2019 15:21:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105314 invoked by uid 89); 11 Dec 2019 15:21:17 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:CAH6eHd, H*i:sk:CAH6eHd, H*i:Mu5, H*i:sk:Ctni783
X-HELO: foss.arm.com
Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.110.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:21:16 +0000
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])	by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D62D30E;	Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:21:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.19] (unknown [172.31.20.19])	by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A5AE3F52E;	Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:21:14 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>, "Eric S. Raymond" <esr@thyrsus.com>, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <1685e719-738f-dd4e-c39c-c08e495b202e@arm.com> <9E009921-96EA-44A2-A06A-232711227E69@linaro.org> <BEB3D1BD-86C3-4B1A-A1BB-62461A7DCAD8@linaro.org> <20191206172111.GA116282@thyrsus.com> <0485C474-1B83-42C2-AEAD-7CA252C6CC12@gmail.com> <20191206194604.GA115432@thyrsus.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1912091742310.26329@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <9C7E86D4-AFDE-4EFB-B804-A03C99042B3E@linaro.org> <8d18e5ca-584c-bec7-c429-b6cc416c78c7@arm.com> <CAH6eHdTq4EhfwvJ_mh19djrtLhvVgzh+Mu5=Ctni783z_WOgnA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Message-ID: <e880ba54-a3d0-4bb7-5b28-6229d458d3a1@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:21:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdTq4EhfwvJ_mh19djrtLhvVgzh+Mu5=Ctni783z_WOgnA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2

On 11/12/2019 15:19, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> I wouldn't bother with that.  There are known defects in the version of
>> reposurgeon that I used to produce that which have since been fixed.  It
>> was *never* the point of that upload to ask for correctness checks on
>> the conversion (I said so at the time).  Instead it was intended to
>> demonstrate the improvements to the commit summaries that I think we can
>> make.
> 
> My concern is that there is no conversion done using reposurgeon that
> *can* be used to do correctness checks.
> 

I have concerns too, but I'm in contact with the reposurgeon guys and
progress *is* being made.

R.