From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 666C13858D37 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 02:51:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 666C13858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1664247057; bh=lbENrEwA+z+AKQnFzgZCfFphWLBThEJdOfSLckENWo4=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cAfUAUJis0fBqZdKtn6dNaRSXkFsKFvMEwg2ilNf4aTYvkzNSpFPXO4YJzfhKazCq THDCqGGV3yQ8VjXOepGeOlWsei1wTLcfeR8p36pLgR9j0vKv6FXdxvHidW/AenVIGs wpfM8xipKRQ7spqbJhrbf6hRXmeoMoidQlGXp7g8= Received: from localhost.localdomain (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1920C65B5F; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 22:50:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Number of ALU in la464.md From: Xi Ruoyao To: Lulu Cheng Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Wang Xuerui Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:50:55 +0800 In-Reply-To: <29636360-2958-faaf-35ff-ed5d9b757900@loongson.cn> References: <85ef5c4398d48c7e1c87692c5f2d56a755f19c09.camel@xry111.site> <29636360-2958-faaf-35ff-ed5d9b757900@loongson.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,MEDICAL_SUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, 2022-09-27 at 10:40 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote: > You are right, I just added it before, but I didn't see the performance= =20 > improvement, >=20 > so I didn't change this place. Alright, so just left la464.md as-is for now. I'll try Phoronix bench suite on LoongArch once a binary distro is in a good shape (Phoronix bench suite uses package managers like apt or dnf but they are not in Linux From Scratch, and I don't have access to expensive SPEC CPU suite). > =E5=9C=A8 2022/9/25 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=887:28, Xi Ruoyao =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > > Hi, > >=20 > > According to the schematic > > (https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/Loongson-3A5000- > > usermanual-EN.html#la464-processor-core, > > Figure 5) we have 4 ALUs in LA464, but in la464.md we only define > > la464_alu1 and la464_alu2. > >=20 > > Should we add la464_alu{3,4} as well, or am I missing something > > here? >=20 --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University