From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 106377 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2019 21:31:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106143 invoked by uid 89); 29 Dec 2019 21:30:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=confidence, HX-Languages-Length:706, guys, continued X-HELO: cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de Received: from cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (HELO cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de) (89.1.8.213) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:30:49 +0000 Received: from cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de [89.1.8.201]) by cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698C2123BE; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 22:30:46 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=netcologne.de; s=nc1116a; t=1577655046; bh=ZIPC78szX1ah2vd6eevcsknLLcXe7G3X0JkkEjgVsgk=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Message-ID:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=EDGXM5gKP0xMXEaEELsJP6WgOxy2BfWy9JzojgyN8NVIm22mXxZWlCNobDKZD0bxX 3LxzAJ+AQ2rFmGi61ebdU8GYcxN2lY+i98qDVtQfV16ypps808Mg+DbSBAn0QrHtqJ ZY5ILfn1RvBNDB5BBLe9OqawbqJmWuCULFfsT0R7W+AbX3yMJ7trWNDdRKB42fgfTq RgefNe1v5aj1EFx6EUTaXiUepzpHXnqheXmt9+2tB0EXPbNgAkhBrw+Sux+Ui3GHxs gPxpNBGaEIYXEqHz/05UiRC4UWjajcI1nbKGVN4u0IrV0mejLCsgemWudJ0QRm1FHr FP+PqqigyKoBA== Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663D011EF4; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 22:30:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [2001:4dd7:c1f2:0:4f93:57dc:bcf4:c716] (helo=cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de) by localhost with ESMTP (eXpurgate 4.11.6) (envelope-from ) id 5e091b06-45d8-7f0000012729-7f000001acac-1 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 22:30:46 +0100 Received: from linux-p51k.fritz.box (2001-4dd7-c1f2-0-4f93-57dc-bcf4-c716.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de [IPv6:2001:4dd7:c1f2:0:4f93:57dc:bcf4:c716]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 22:30:43 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT To: Segher Boessenkool , Julien '_FrnchFrgg_' RIVAUD Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20191226183553.GK10088@tucnak> <20191228121921.GW4505@gate.crashing.org> <20191228202824.GZ4505@gate.crashing.org> <20191229104100.GA3191@gate.crashing.org> <98729b61-2322-4244-7bde-f29c7e654d59@free.fr> <20191229132649.GC3191@gate.crashing.org> From: Thomas Koenig Message-ID: Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:31:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191229132649.GC3191@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00517.txt.bz2 Am 29.12.19 um 14:26 schrieb Segher Boessenkool: > We cannot waste a year on a social experiment. We can slowly and carefully > adopt new procedures, certainly. But anything drastic isn't advisable imo. > > Also, many GCC developers aren't familiar with Git at all. It takes time > to learn it, and to learn new ways of working. Small steps are needed. Amen to that. My uses of git have can be counted in a single digit (in decimal). I am just hoping you guys know what you are doing, and I am a bit apprehensive about the change and my continued ability to contribute. Talk of a radical new development model does not raise my confidence.