From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-117890-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13836 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2005 16:09:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13822 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2005 16:09:11 -0000
Received: from mail-out1.fuse.net (HELO smtp1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.174)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:09:11 +0000
Received: from gx4.fuse.net ([216.68.189.117]) by smtp1.fuse.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP
          id <20050730160907.WUQG4201.smtp1.fuse.net@gx4.fuse.net>
          for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:09:07 -0400
Received: from dellpi.pinski.fam ([216.68.189.117]) by gx4.fuse.net
          (InterMail vG.1.02.00.02 201-2136-104-102-20041210) with ESMTP
          id <20050730160906.SWCU18650.gx4.fuse.net@dellpi.pinski.fam>;
          Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:09:06 -0400
Received: from [10.0.0.80] (zhivago.i.pinski.fam [10.0.0.80])
	by dellpi.pinski.fam (8.12.2/8.12.1) with ESMTP id j6UG92Dk010140;
	Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:09:02 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <20050730155223.F2B211DC154@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
References: <20050730155223.F2B211DC154@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <f4f0e60bee65de20d84b218c77240c81@physics.uc.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, schwab@suse.de
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: strange error on gcc 4.1.0
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:09:00 -0000
To: howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu (Jack Howarth)
X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg01254.txt.bz2


On Jul 30, 2005, at 11:52 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:

>    I can't find a patch either using google but I did find the  
> following
> posting which describes the problem and a workaround...
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/ 
> msg10604.html

I finally found the patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-12/msg00655.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-10/msg01961.html

But I don't know what happened to it or came up from the discussion.

-- Pinski