From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 107415 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2020 22:18:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107397 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jan 2020 22:18:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (207.211.31.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:17:59 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1578953877; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HBbT16GBEHcXhtdX+4ZR1QQmomLbV5V0sgCfPbcSwx0=; b=UYo2iVaHaQtGigxBo50ezmy585xFriNMJZJme6ZnFIs8EAStE+TrzSPS1d5nQEQidwe8Vq avqsK06kkA0Ne+ynOrciO8+cacWY8Xt67iN91IL6iSa7V/YKFSqADcm//DJULIETl8fywM 7gktJHMWNTWOtkwQ1lgTX9aaOyVmp8g= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-409-FSzNIZiBOxWBcY0TdMPA-Q-1; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:17:54 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E23B5107ACC4; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-112-23.phx2.redhat.com (ovpn-112-23.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0A510842A9; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT From: Jeff Law Reply-To: law@redhat.com To: Joseph Myers Cc: "Eric S. Raymond" , Maxim Kuvyrkov , "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , GCC Development , Alexandre Oliva , Segher Boessenkool , Mark Wielaard , Jakub Jelinek Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 08:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20191226111633.GJ10088@tucnak> <5DCEA32B-3E36-4400-B931-9F4E2A8F3FA5@linaro.org> <155B5BFD-6ECF-4EBF-A38C-D6DD178FB497@linaro.org> <2b6330f2-1a00-ac89-fd3c-4b70e5454f4b@arm.com> <9B71A0F7-CD93-4636-BFC7-1D1DBC040F07@linaro.org> <6EE7BD53-6677-49D2-BCDD-56CD7DA855E9@linaro.org> <88B4DAF3-33C1-445F-8F5A-809D5463D0F9@linaro.org> <20200108221119.GA94728@thyrsus.com> <115bd7cf97041d72c3c49749c91d4518e682f90d.camel@redhat.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 12:30 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, Jeff Law wrote: > > > Is there any chance we could get one more trunk snapshot before the > > conversion starts -- even if that means firing up the snapshot process > > Friday? It'd be quite useful for the ongoing Fedora build testing. > > I could run a snapshot manually. I was planning to run at least one > snapshot (for some branch) manually *after* the conversion to test the > conversion of the gcc_release script to use git (in snapshot mode that > doesn't make any commits so could be done while the git repository is > still read-only for checking). THanks. It was greatly appreciated. Jeff