From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 112834 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2020 18:03:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112826 invoked by uid 89); 27 Feb 2020 18:03:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*MI:sk:DEDBE6C, H*i:sk:DEDBE6C, H*f:sk:DEDBE6C X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.110.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:03:12 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146E71FB; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:03:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.2.80.62] (e120808-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.2.80.62]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97F533F73B; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:03:10 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [AArch64] Backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc 9.x and 8.x To: "Pop, Sebastian" , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Cc: "richard.henderson@linaro.org" References: From: Kyrill Tkachov Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:03:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 Hi Sebastian, On 2/27/20 4:53 PM, Pop, Sebastian wrote: > > Hi, > > is somebody already working on backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc > 8.x and 9.x branches? > I'm not aware of such work going on. Thanks, Kyrill > Thanks, > > Sebastian >