From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com>
To: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@redhat.com>
Cc: gdr@codesourcery.com (Gabriel Dos Reis),
dewar@gnat.com, aoliva@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
moshier@moshier.ne.mediaone.net, torvalds@transmeta.com,
tprince@computer.org
Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <flpuah7l80.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200107310443.f6V4hdh09169@phal.cambridge.redhat.com>
Joern Rennecke <amylaar@redhat.com> writes:
| > That said, I don't mind about -fdubious-math as far as it is not the
| > default, nor turned on at any level of optimization.
|
| For a user, it's hard to guess or remember user that -fdubious-math
| and -ffast-math are related. How about -ffast-and-loose-math ?
I was actually proposing to rename -ffast-math to -fdubious-math :-)
but your proposal has also my support :-))
-- Gaby
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-30 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-30 21:13 dewar
2001-07-30 21:34 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 21:43 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-07-30 21:53 ` Gabriel Dos Reis [this message]
2001-08-03 7:12 ` Nick Ing-Simmons
2001-07-31 18:12 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Linus Torvalds
2001-08-01 8:55 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Theodore Papadopoulo
2001-08-01 9:15 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-08-01 11:21 ` Theodore Papadopoulo
2001-08-01 11:44 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-08-01 11:58 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Linus Torvalds
2001-08-01 9:24 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Tim Hollebeek
2001-08-01 9:54 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Linus Torvalds
2001-08-01 10:26 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-01 10:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-01 10:45 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-01 11:13 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Alexandre Oliva
2001-08-01 11:36 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-08-01 12:07 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-08-01 13:21 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-01 14:20 ` Toon Moene
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-03 14:48 dewar
2001-08-02 3:37 Vincent Penquerc'h
2001-08-01 19:04 Carlo Wood
2001-08-01 12:06 Phil Edwards
2001-08-01 10:39 dewar
2001-08-01 10:38 dewar
2001-08-01 10:13 dewar
2001-08-01 10:05 dewar
2001-08-01 10:04 dewar
2001-08-01 10:28 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-01 9:59 dewar
2001-08-01 9:58 What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-01 10:08 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
2001-08-01 11:12 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-01 11:27 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Theodore Papadopoulo
2001-08-01 11:47 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
2001-08-03 7:32 ` Nick Ing-Simmons
2001-08-03 6:01 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-08-01 6:52 dewar
2001-08-01 6:04 dewar
2001-08-01 6:48 ` Vincent Penquerc'h
2001-08-03 0:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-08-01 3:02 Vincent Penquerc'h
2001-07-31 19:10 dewar
2001-07-31 18:23 dewar
2001-07-31 18:20 dewar
2001-07-31 18:50 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-07-31 21:27 ` Tim Prince
2001-07-31 18:15 dewar
2001-07-31 18:12 What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Linus Torvalds
2001-07-31 20:55 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-31 17:37 dewar
2001-07-31 16:38 dewar
2001-07-31 9:22 mike stump
2001-07-31 8:37 dewar
2001-07-31 8:36 mike stump
2001-07-31 8:36 dewar
2001-07-31 8:35 dewar
2001-07-31 8:19 mike stump
2001-07-31 7:59 mike stump
2001-07-31 7:26 dewar
2001-07-31 15:57 ` Toon Moene
2001-07-31 21:55 ` Tim Prince
2001-08-03 6:12 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-07-30 20:54 dewar
2001-07-30 21:11 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 21:39 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-07-30 19:46 dewar
2001-07-30 20:00 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 20:20 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-30 20:25 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 18:39 dewar
2001-07-30 18:38 dewar
2001-07-30 18:08 dewar
2001-07-30 18:02 dewar
2001-07-30 18:00 dewar
2001-07-30 18:25 ` Joe Buck
2001-07-30 16:11 dewar
2001-07-30 16:29 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-31 8:13 ` Kevin Handy
2001-07-30 15:29 dewar
2001-07-30 15:39 ` Toon Moene
2001-07-30 13:10 dewar
2001-07-30 12:26 dewar
2001-07-30 11:52 dewar
2001-07-30 11:37 What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Linus Torvalds
2001-07-30 11:53 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 18:40 ` Olivier Galibert
2001-07-30 19:06 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-31 1:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-31 2:04 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-31 2:35 ` Olivier Galibert
2001-07-31 2:58 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-31 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-30 8:59 mike stump
2001-07-30 6:14 dewar
2001-07-30 8:30 ` Kevin Handy
2001-07-30 6:01 dewar
2001-07-30 6:53 ` Tim Hollebeek
2001-07-30 6:00 dewar
2001-07-30 13:08 ` Toon Moene
2001-07-30 5:57 dewar
2001-07-29 21:33 What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Linus Torvalds
2001-07-30 14:43 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-30 15:45 ` Neil Booth
2001-07-30 16:03 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-30 16:11 ` Neil Booth
2001-07-30 16:28 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-30 19:08 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-07-30 19:22 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-30 19:29 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 19:34 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-30 19:54 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-30 19:27 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-29 14:22 dewar
2001-07-29 12:52 * Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative lawin combine) Linus Torvalds
2001-07-29 14:03 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine) Stephen L Moshier
2001-07-29 21:17 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Fergus Henderson
2001-07-30 0:23 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-17 15:59 associative law in combine Joern Rennecke
2001-07-18 1:01 ` Toon Moene
2001-07-18 1:47 ` What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine) Jan Hubicka
2001-07-28 23:04 ` Tim Prince
2001-07-29 6:33 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-29 10:18 ` Tim Prince
2001-07-29 10:26 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-29 12:11 ` Tim Prince
2001-07-29 12:17 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-29 10:50 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=flpuah7l80.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr \
--to=gdr@codesourcery.com \
--cc=amylaar@redhat.com \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=dewar@gnat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=moshier@moshier.ne.mediaone.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=tprince@computer.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).