public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Deprecation of -I- and -iquote
@ 2010-04-11 11:19 Rodolfo Lima
  2010-04-12 17:18 ` Tom Tromey
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rodolfo Lima @ 2010-04-11 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc

I wonder what's the current state of -I- vs. -iquote, is there anyone
interested in fixing the fact that -iquote doesn't replace -I-
functionality, needed for out-of-source precompiled header utilization?

The relevant bug is 19541 - need another option to support what -I- did
just besides -iquote, and there's a patch floating around that adds
-ignore-source-dir flag
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00653.html). What else is
needed move this forward?

Regards,
Rodolfo Lima

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Deprecation of -I- and -iquote
  2010-04-11 11:19 Deprecation of -I- and -iquote Rodolfo Lima
@ 2010-04-12 17:18 ` Tom Tromey
  2010-04-12 18:35   ` Rodolfo Schulz de Lima
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2010-04-12 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rodolfo Lima; +Cc: gcc

>>>>> "Rodolfo" == Rodolfo Lima <rodolfo@rodsoft.org> writes:

Rodolfo> I wonder what's the current state of -I- vs. -iquote, is there anyone
Rodolfo> interested in fixing the fact that -iquote doesn't replace -I-
Rodolfo> functionality, needed for out-of-source precompiled header utilization?

AFAIK the patch is still waiting for a review.  I don't know what the
hangup is.  Perhaps it needs more frequent pings.

Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Deprecation of -I- and -iquote
  2010-04-12 17:18 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2010-04-12 18:35   ` Rodolfo Schulz de Lima
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rodolfo Schulz de Lima @ 2010-04-12 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc

Tom Tromey wrote:
> AFAIK the patch is still waiting for a review.  I don't know what the
> hangup is.  Perhaps it needs more frequent pings.

So, whoever is responsible for this, please step forward :) I'll test
the patch when I get home, but I have no knowledge of gcc's internals to
make a thorough check. The message gcc output, saying that -iquote
should be used instead of -I- is just plain wrong. Seeing that 4.5.0
release is just around the corner, is it feasible to have this patch
committed into 4.5 branch?

Best regards,
Rodolfo Lima

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-12 18:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-11 11:19 Deprecation of -I- and -iquote Rodolfo Lima
2010-04-12 17:18 ` Tom Tromey
2010-04-12 18:35   ` Rodolfo Schulz de Lima

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).