From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15983 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2011 17:50:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 15974 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Oct 2011 17:50:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:50:10 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGwkq-00081y-Fw for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:50:08 +0200 Received: from 193.128.72.68 ([193.128.72.68]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:50:08 +0200 Received: from paulo by 193.128.72.68 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:50:08 +0200 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org From: "Paulo J. Matos" Subject: Re: IRA changes rules of the game Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <201110201525.p9KFPixB010921@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20111020131234.71tw5vjz6ogo0884-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: <20111020131234.71tw5vjz6ogo0884-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00367.txt.bz2 On 20/10/11 18:12, Joern Rennecke wrote: > > Or just change the constraint to "+c" . > After trying Ulrichs suggestion and getting it to work I decided to give yours a try since it looked cleaner using +c and dups elsewhere. However, it failed to compile libgcc with: ../../../../../../../devHost/gcc46/gcc/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:272:1: internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3178 This feels like a GCC bug. I will try to get a better look at it tomorrow. -- PMatos