Re: GCC 3.1 Release

[Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>]

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

|> --On Monday, May 06, 2002 04:57:28 PM +0200 Andreas Schwab
|>   <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
|> 
|> > Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
|> >
|> >|> --On Monday, May 06, 2002 12:24:31 PM +0200 Andreas Schwab
|> >|>   <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
|> >|>
|> >|> > Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
|> >|> >
|> >|> > |> Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
|> >|> > |>
|> >|> > |> > Therefore, as of now, I will be accepting *no* patches that do
|> >|> > |> > not
|> >|> > fix |> > regressions.
|> >|> > |>
|> >|> > |> Can we change the following two things, even if they aren't
|> >|> > |> regressions?
|> >|> >
|> >|> > They _are_ regressions, because they cause bootstrap failures.
|> >|>
|> >|> May I have a pointer to the patches you want checked in?
|> >
|> > For the line-too-long problem:
|> >
|> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg00459.html
|> 
|> That patch is OK.

Thanks.  I checked it in and also took the liberty to check in
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg00601.html>.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."