From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
To: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure?
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jmad4krb0m.fsf@desire.geoffk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ad4ksxma.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
"Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
> Of course inefficiencies are going to be introduced if we just convert
> each macro to a target hook with the same semantics. But that isn't
> the only option on the table. The right thing is to redesign this
> interface so that it doesn't *need* 100+ macros and toggles. If this
> is done properly, then not only should there be no inefficiency
> introduced by going through the target vector, but also we would have
> something that was straightforward to maintain and straightforward to
> add support for new architectures.
I agree with this paragraph. Our function-call ABI description is
very suboptimal, and performance is the least of the problems; I think
there are still targets where no-one can describe the ABI without
making reference to function.c.
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-19 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-18 8:37 Ian Lance Taylor
2004-01-18 9:03 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-01-18 14:09 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-01-18 22:25 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-01-19 0:53 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-01-19 1:18 ` Geoff Keating [this message]
2004-01-18 11:30 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-01-18 13:58 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2004-01-18 19:54 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-01-18 20:10 ` Richard Henderson
2004-01-18 20:17 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-01-18 21:14 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-01-18 22:05 ` Richard Henderson
2004-01-18 22:22 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-01-18 22:37 ` Richard Henderson
2004-01-19 19:33 ` DJ Delorie
2004-01-19 20:41 ` Richard Henderson
2004-01-19 1:12 ` Geoff Keating
2004-01-19 13:51 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-01-18 22:18 Chris Lattner
2004-01-18 22:33 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-01-18 22:40 ` Chris Lattner
2004-01-18 22:48 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-01-18 22:50 ` Chris Lattner
2004-01-18 23:27 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-01-18 23:34 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-01-19 1:36 ` Chris Lattner
2004-01-18 22:42 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-01-18 22:44 ` Chris Lattner
2004-01-18 22:36 ` Richard Henderson
2004-01-18 22:42 ` Chris Lattner
2004-01-19 11:51 Richard Kenner
2004-01-19 12:01 ` Richard Guenther
2004-01-19 20:02 ` Richard Henderson
2004-01-19 14:16 ` Robert Dewar
2004-01-19 18:03 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-01-19 18:18 Richard Kenner
2004-01-19 18:26 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-01-19 19:05 Richard Kenner
2004-01-19 21:15 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-01-19 21:25 Richard Kenner
2004-01-19 23:36 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-01-19 23:42 Richard Kenner
2004-01-19 23:46 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-01-19 23:48 Richard Kenner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jmad4krb0m.fsf@desire.geoffk.org \
--to=geoffk@geoffk.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).