From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3952 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2003 19:13:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3936 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 19:13:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO desire.geoffk.org) (12.235.57.148) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 31 Jan 2003 19:13:09 -0000 Received: (from geoffk@localhost) by desire.geoffk.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0VJBnk04983; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:11:49 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: desire.geoffk.org: geoffk set sender to geoffk@geoffk.org using -f To: Joe Buck Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 References: <20030130181313.7d3c5820.bkoz@redhat.com> <20030130182059.C23205@synopsys.com> From: Geoff Keating Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 20:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030130182059.C23205@synopsys.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01800.txt.bz2 Joe Buck writes: > > I think the longer gcc, as a project, goes on without an autobuild > > continuous regression checker, the worse off things will get. It was > > nice of Red Hat to initially support this effort, but it is obvious that > > this time is past as the regression checker is long dead. Somebody else > > will have to step up with the bandwidth, time, and machine to do this. > > Agreed. It may be easier to get someone to donate the bandwidth/machine > if we can hand them a relatively-easy-to-setup hunk of software and just > ask them to run it. There is already a tester running, on powerpc-Darwin; you haven't gotten any mail from it because the tree has been fairly stable recently (even the new C++ parser went in without a big ripple). It does need a web site; now that sources is upgraded maybe I'll ask about putting its web site there. -- - Geoffrey Keating