From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27844 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2002 20:44:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27833 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 20:44:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO desire.geoffk.org) (12.235.56.190) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 20:44:12 -0000 Received: (from geoffk@localhost) by desire.geoffk.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBGKiAv13182; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:44:10 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: desire.geoffk.org: geoffk set sender to geoffk@geoffk.org using -f To: Zack Weinberg CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: basic-improvements merge status References: <87u1hex3o9.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> From: Geoff Keating Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87u1hex3o9.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00923.txt.bz2 Zack Weinberg writes: > It is not clear to me that any purpose is served by holding off the > merge to trunk until all these issues get resolved. We could instead > do the merge now and fix the problems on the mainline; this would let > people move forward with other work. I don't know what 'people' are helped by having the mainline unbuildable and untestable. I'm very unhappy about the way this merge was handled. -- - Geoffrey Keating