From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42332-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4588 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2001 09:45:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4374 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2001 09:44:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO geoffk.org) (205.180.231.50)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2001 09:44:49 -0000
Received: (from geoffk@localhost)
	by geoffk.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA16470;
	Thu, 6 Dec 2001 01:44:03 -0800
To: guerby@acm.org
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: ACATS legal status cleared by FSF
References: <200112052305.fB5N5D700531@ulmo.localdomain>
Reply-to: Geoff Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>
From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 03:36:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: 's message of "Thu, 6 Dec 2001 00:05:13 +0100"
Message-ID: <jmd71sznrx.fsf@geoffk.org>
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2

<guerby@acm.org> writes:

> I just received confirmation from FSF that ACATS DFAR legalese means
> that we can do whatever we want with it. In this email I make a few
> descriptions and proposals, they start by [N].
...

You do plan to use dejagnu to run the tests, correct?

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> <geoffk@redhat.com>