From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26330 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 01:12:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26323 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 01:12:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO desire.geoffk.org) (67.169.96.182) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 01:12:49 -0000 Received: from desire.geoffk.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by desire.geoffk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0J1CmQ0020644; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 17:12:49 -0800 Received: (from geoffk@localhost) by desire.geoffk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0J1Cmfg020640; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 17:12:48 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: desire.geoffk.org: geoffk set sender to geoffk@geoffk.org using -f To: Ian Lance Taylor CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? References: <20040118083738.10772.qmail@gossamer.airs.com> From: Geoff Keating Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040118083738.10772.qmail@gossamer.airs.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01229.txt.bz2 Ian Lance Taylor writes: ... > Any thoughts? Does anybody think this would be a waste of time? Does > anybody have a better approach to solving the general problem? What happens if you compile with --enable-intermodule? -- - Geoffrey Keating