From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3300 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2004 20:51:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3286 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2004 20:51:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2004 20:51:46 -0000 Received: by perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Postfix, from userid 20178) id DBEFA10BD29; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:51:44 -0500 (EST) To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1 References: <20040320204131.1A20D10B6F8@perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> From: James Morrison Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 23:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040320204131.1A20D10B6F8@perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01219.txt.bz2 ja2morri@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (James Morrison) writes: > Hi, > > I'm looking at the testcases gcc.dg/2000{1013-1,1101-1,1102-1} which > all only run on sparcv9 or sparc64. However, the assembly for the tests > has very little difference between compiling the tests with -mv8plus -mvis > and -mcpu=ultrasparc -mvis. The differences are attached. I'm not exactly > sure if this will work on Solaris, especially old versions, but I think it > will. Anyway, if these tests are compiled with -mv8plus -mvis then they > can run on sparc*-- instead of sparcv9 and sparc64. > > Jim > > notes: t5.s are compiled with -m32 -O2 -mv8plus -mvis > t2.s are compiled with -m32 -O2 -mcpu=ultrasparc -mvis Silly me. The diffs, I nicely removed, were generated from the test cases compiled with gcc 3.3.3 in debian unstable. Jim