* useless stores generated when returning a struct -- bug?
@ 2010-05-18 18:06 Joshua Haberman
2010-05-19 0:09 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Haberman @ 2010-05-18 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
I have a case where I think useless stores are being generated, but I
want to be sure before I file a bug. This is with gcc 4.4.3 on Ubuntu
10.04, x86-64.
I have been experimenting with returning structs from functions instead
of passing pointers to "out" parameters. This seems like it should be
more optimizer-friendly because you can avoid taking addresses of local
variables, which prevents them from possibly being aliased.
However in this test case, gcc is generating four stores that appear to
be completely useless:
#include <stdint.h>
struct twoints { uint64_t a, b; } foo();
void bar(uint64_t a, uint64_t b);
void func() {
struct twoints s = foo();
bar(s.a, s.b);
}
$ gcc -Wall -c -o testbad.o -msse2 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer testbad.c-
$ objdump -d -r -M intel testbad.o
testbad.o: file format elf64-x86-64
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000000000 <func>:
0: 48 83 ec 28 sub rsp,0x28
4: 31 c0 xor eax,eax
6: e8 00 00 00 00 call b <func+0xb>
7: R_X86_64_PC32 foo-0x4
b: 48 89 04 24 mov QWORD PTR [rsp],rax
f: 48 89 54 24 08 mov QWORD PTR [rsp+0x8],rdx
14: 48 89 d6 mov rsi,rdx
17: 48 89 44 24 10 mov QWORD PTR [rsp+0x10],rax
1c: 48 89 54 24 18 mov QWORD PTR [rsp+0x18],rdx
21: 48 89 c7 mov rdi,rax
24: 48 83 c4 28 add rsp,0x28
28: e9 00 00 00 00 jmp 2d <func+0x2d>
29: R_X86_64_PC32 bar-0x4
Why is it storing rax and rdx to the stack twice? These stores are never
used AFAICS.
Josh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: useless stores generated when returning a struct -- bug?
2010-05-18 18:06 useless stores generated when returning a struct -- bug? Joshua Haberman
@ 2010-05-19 0:09 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-05-19 0:19 ` Joshua Haberman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2010-05-19 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua Haberman; +Cc: gcc
Joshua Haberman <jhaberman@gmail.com> writes:
> I have a case where I think useless stores are being generated, but I
> want to be sure before I file a bug. This is with gcc 4.4.3 on Ubuntu
> 10.04, x86-64.
I concur that this is a missed optimization bug.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: useless stores generated when returning a struct -- bug?
2010-05-19 0:09 ` Ian Lance Taylor
@ 2010-05-19 0:19 ` Joshua Haberman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Haberman @ 2010-05-19 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Ian Lance Taylor <iant <at> google.com> writes:
> Joshua Haberman <jhaberman <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I have a case where I think useless stores are being generated, but I
> > want to be sure before I file a bug. This is with gcc 4.4.3 on Ubuntu
> > 10.04, x86-64.
>
> I concur that this is a missed optimization bug.
Thanks Ian. I'll file it as a bug.
Josh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-19 0:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-18 18:06 useless stores generated when returning a struct -- bug? Joshua Haberman
2010-05-19 0:09 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-05-19 0:19 ` Joshua Haberman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).