From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) To: law@cygnus.com Cc: egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: egcs 1.0.2 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 08:50:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <1608.887561286@hurl.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 1998-02/msg00695.html > > > In message < m0y478b-0004eeC@ocean.lucon.org >you write: > > One of them is definitely critical. egcs 1.0.1 is broken on x86 at > > least with long double. I don't know what else is not working > > right. Basically egcs 1.0.1 turns > I'd hesitate to call a long double bug critical -- few folks use > long double on a regular basis. > I cannot use egcs 1.0.x to compile glibc 2 since it uses long double in many places. That is how I noticed the bug. It is hard to convince anyone to use egcs 1.0.x if they want to use glibc 2, who happen to be Debian, RedHat and SUSE. -- H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)