From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) To: law@cygnus.com Cc: egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: No prototype for is_java_type Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 09:29:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <15841.894643898@hurl.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 1998-05/msg00278.html > If you'd take a look the one patch that you "un-megaized" did go in after > I fixed several problems with it (rtl.h prototyping). > Before I send in many patches, what about the format of prototype? I have seen many different ones for the new prototypes: extern int foo PROTO((void)); extern int foo PROTO ((void)); extern int foo PROTO ((void)); extern int foo PROTO((void)); Does that mean any of above is ok now? -- H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)