* Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1
@ 1998-09-26 17:40 David Rees
1998-09-27 11:51 ` Craig Burley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Rees @ 1998-09-26 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: egcs
There seems to be a lot of errors in this snapshot. I compiled with
egcs-1.1b.
-Dave
Native configuration is i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1
=== libio tests ===
Running target unix
=== libio Summary ===
# of expected passes 40
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 30
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/980506-2.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/980506-2.c execution, -O2 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/980506-2.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/980526-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution, -O2 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2f.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution, -O2 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2g.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/980619-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/980619-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/980619-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/980619-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/980619-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/980619-1.c execution, -O2 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/980619-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/clobbers.c execution test
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 7565
# of unexpected failures 24
# of expected failures 7
# of unsupported tests 12
/disk2/users/drees/egcs/gcc/xgcc version egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.mike/p6610b.C caused compiler crash
FAIL: g++.mike/p784.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/p785.C caused compiler crash
FAIL: g++.mike/virt5.C caused compiler crash
FAIL: g++.other/friend4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/nested2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.pt/explicit71.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 4475
# of unexpected failures 7
# of expected failures 88
# of untested testcases 7
/disk2/users/drees/egcs/gcc/testsuite/../xgcc version egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/970816-3.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/970816-3.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/970816-3.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/970816-3.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/970816-3.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/971102-1.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/971102-1.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/971102-1.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/971102-1.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/971102-1.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/971102-1.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/971102-1.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980520-1.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980520-1.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980520-1.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980520-1.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980520-1.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-0.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-0.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-0.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-0.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-0.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-1.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-1.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-1.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-1.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-1.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-10.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-10.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-10.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-10.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-10.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-2.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-2.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-2.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-2.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-2.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-3.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-3.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-3.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-3.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-3.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-4.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-4.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-4.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-4.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-4.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-5.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-5.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-5.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-5.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-5.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-6.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-6.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-6.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-6.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-6.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-7.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-7.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-7.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-7.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-7.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-8.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-8.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-8.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-8.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-8.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-9.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-9.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-9.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-9.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980628-9.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980701-0.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980701-0.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980701-0.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980701-0.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980701-0.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980701-1.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980701-1.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980701-1.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980701-1.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980701-1.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/alpha2.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/alpha2.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/alpha2.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/alpha2.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/alpha2.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto0.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto0.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto0.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto0.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto0.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto0.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto0.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto1.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto1.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto1.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto1.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto1.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto1.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto1.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cabs.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cabs.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cabs.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cabs.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cabs.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/claus.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/claus.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/claus.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/claus.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/claus.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/claus.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/claus.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/complex_1.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/complex_1.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/complex_1.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/complex_1.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/complex_1.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dcomplex.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dcomplex.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dcomplex.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dcomplex.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dcomplex.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/erfc.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/erfc.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/erfc.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/erfc.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/erfc.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/exp.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/exp.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/exp.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/exp.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/exp.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/io0.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/io0.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/io0.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/io0.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/io0.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/large_vec.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/large_vec.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/large_vec.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/large_vec.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/large_vec.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/le.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/le.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/le.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/le.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/le.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f compilation, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cpp.F compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cpp.F compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cpp.F compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cpp.F compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cpp.F compilation, -Os
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 86
# of unexpected failures 174
# of untested testcases 174
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-1.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-10.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-11.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-12.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-13.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-14.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-15.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-16.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-17.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-18.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-19.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-2.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-3.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-4.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-5.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-6.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-7.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-8.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-9.m compilation, -O
=== objc Summary ===
# of unexpected failures 19
# of untested testcases 19
/disk2/users/drees/egcs/gcc/xgcc version egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
configure flags: --with-gcc-version-trigger=/home/drees/disk2/egcs-19980921/gcc/version.c --host=i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1 --prefix=/opt/egcs --norecursion
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1
1998-09-26 17:40 Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1 David Rees
@ 1998-09-27 11:51 ` Craig Burley
1998-09-27 17:34 ` Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental) H.J. Lu
1998-09-27 20:41 ` libf2c build problems? Was: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1 Robert Lipe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Craig Burley @ 1998-09-27 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: drees; +Cc: burley
>There seems to be a lot of errors in this snapshot. I compiled with
>egcs-1.1b.
On my Alpha (RH 5.0 Linux), this snapshot didn't even bother building
some libraries, such as libf2c. I haven't had time to investigate
why, yet. And, there were comparison failures in the bootstrap
build as well, in about 7 source files (one in g77). The previous
snapshot was fine in these respects.
I suspect the snapshot includes a misapplied patch or two that
makes it DOA, or nearly so...but if nobody speaks up with
an "aha!", I'll try and look into it later this week. (By "misapplied"
I include partially applied patches as well.)
tq vm, (burley)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
1998-09-27 11:51 ` Craig Burley
@ 1998-09-27 17:34 ` H.J. Lu
1998-09-28 3:19 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-09-27 20:41 ` libf2c build problems? Was: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1 Robert Lipe
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 1998-09-27 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Craig Burley; +Cc: drees, egcs
>
> >There seems to be a lot of errors in this snapshot. I compiled with
> >egcs-1.1b.
>
> On my Alpha (RH 5.0 Linux), this snapshot didn't even bother building
> some libraries, such as libf2c. I haven't had time to investigate
> why, yet. And, there were comparison failures in the bootstrap
> build as well, in about 7 source files (one in g77). The previous
> snapshot was fine in these respects.
>
> I suspect the snapshot includes a misapplied patch or two that
> makes it DOA, or nearly so...but if nobody speaks up with
> an "aha!", I'll try and look into it later this week. (By "misapplied"
> I include partially applied patches as well.)
>
I can confirm that the current egcs miscompiles libg++ on Linux/x86.
I also saw report that it miscompiled glibc 2.1 on Linux/x86. They
may be related. It will be nice if people run test on libg++ before
they check in changes. I have suggested it many times before. It went
nowhere. The result is everyone wastes time on those bugs which can be
caught by libg++. Should that be a check-in requirement?
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* libf2c build problems? Was: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1
1998-09-27 11:51 ` Craig Burley
1998-09-27 17:34 ` Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental) H.J. Lu
@ 1998-09-27 20:41 ` Robert Lipe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Robert Lipe @ 1998-09-27 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Craig Burley, drees; +Cc: egcs
Craig Burley wrote:
> On my Alpha (RH 5.0 Linux), this snapshot didn't even bother building
> some libraries, such as libf2c. I haven't had time to investigate
Ewww. Bummer.
I just tried a build on a RH5.1 Linux/x86 version on a version patched
up from who-knows-what snapshot of the past and it died during the build
of libf2c. I did a 'make clean-target-libf2c' followed by a 'make
all-target-libf2c' and it passed. I was unable to recreate the failure,
so I'm going to assume (?) that there was some stamp file or something
else left over that confused things when that directory got multilibbed
last week. A 'make check-target-libf2c' seems to work OK, so whatever
the original failure was (it's not in my scrollback) seems to be gone.
If you and the original poster could try this same "fix", that might
be an easy out...
> I suspect the snapshot includes a misapplied patch or two that
> makes it DOA, or nearly so...but if nobody speaks up with
> an "aha!", I'll try and look into it later this week. (By "misapplied"
> I include partially applied patches as well.)
If it simplifies things, you can blame me for mangling the Makefiles
until a more clearly identifiable culprit steps forward. :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
1998-09-27 17:34 ` Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental) H.J. Lu
@ 1998-09-28 3:19 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-09-29 10:10 ` Manfred Hollstein
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1998-09-28 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: Craig Burley, drees, egcs
In message < m0zNRH0-000395C@ocean.lucon.org >you write:
> nowhere. The result is everyone wastes time on those bugs which can be
> caught by libg++. Should that be a check-in requirement?
No. It should not be a check-in requirement.
If we ever have check-in requirements, they would include either a
bootstrap of the compiler or running the existing testsuite, not
building/testing external code like libg++.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
1998-09-28 3:19 ` Jeffrey A Law
@ 1998-09-29 10:10 ` Manfred Hollstein
1998-09-29 13:08 ` H.J. Lu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Manfred Hollstein @ 1998-09-29 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: law; +Cc: hjl, burley, drees, egcs
On Mon, 28 September 1998, 03:41:35, law@cygnus.com wrote:
>
> In message < m0zNRH0-000395C@ocean.lucon.org >you write:
> > nowhere. The result is everyone wastes time on those bugs which can be
> > caught by libg++. Should that be a check-in requirement?
> No. It should not be a check-in requirement.
>
> If we ever have check-in requirements, they would include either a
> bootstrap of the compiler or running the existing testsuite, not
> building/testing external code like libg++.
>
> jeff
But, I agree with H.J., it would be fine if more people were testing
libg++ from time to time. For instance, the current mainline sources
look pretty much OK without libg++, but with libg++ "make check" fails
for hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20, m68k-motorola-sysv and m88k-motorola-sysv3.
Perhaps it would also be helpful if we'd extend the test_summary script
to report if "configure"d directories have been found in the tree, but
the particular *.log files are missing. Currently if libg++ fails, no
results are posted for libg++ and nobody knows there's a problem :-(
manfred
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
1998-09-29 10:10 ` Manfred Hollstein
@ 1998-09-29 13:08 ` H.J. Lu
1998-09-29 22:26 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 1998-09-29 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: manfred, Manfred.Hollstein; +Cc: egcs
> But, I agree with H.J., it would be fine if more people were testing
> libg++ from time to time. For instance, the current mainline sources
> look pretty much OK without libg++, but with libg++ "make check" fails
> for hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20, m68k-motorola-sysv and m88k-motorola-sysv3.
> Perhaps it would also be helpful if we'd extend the test_summary script
> to report if "configure"d directories have been found in the tree, but
> the particular *.log files are missing. Currently if libg++ fails, no
> results are posted for libg++ and nobody knows there's a problem :-(
>
FWIW, the current egcs in CVS still miscompiles libg++ on
Linux/x86. I may not have time to look into it before the
end of October.
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
1998-09-29 13:08 ` H.J. Lu
@ 1998-09-29 22:26 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1998-09-29 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: manfred, Manfred.Hollstein, egcs
In message < m0zO619-000395C@ocean.lucon.org >you write:
> > But, I agree with H.J., it would be fine if more people were testing
> > libg++ from time to time. For instance, the current mainline sources
> > look pretty much OK without libg++, but with libg++ "make check" fails
> > for hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20, m68k-motorola-sysv and m88k-motorola-sysv3.
> > Perhaps it would also be helpful if we'd extend the test_summary script
> > to report if "configure"d directories have been found in the tree, but
> > the particular *.log files are missing. Currently if libg++ fails, no
> > results are posted for libg++ and nobody knows there's a problem :-(
> >
>
> FWIW, the current egcs in CVS still miscompiles libg++ on
> Linux/x86. I may not have time to look into it before the
> end of October.
I would not be overly concerned about this right now. We're supposed to be
working on development not stability for the mainline tree right now.
Fixing the bug is important, but not critical at the moment.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-09-29 22:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-09-26 17:40 Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1 David Rees
1998-09-27 11:51 ` Craig Burley
1998-09-27 17:34 ` Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental) H.J. Lu
1998-09-28 3:19 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-09-29 10:10 ` Manfred Hollstein
1998-09-29 13:08 ` H.J. Lu
1998-09-29 22:26 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-09-27 20:41 ` libf2c build problems? Was: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1 Robert Lipe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).