From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
To: Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2is82okds.fsf@greed.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C949FF38-2681-48A5-94D9-0228551C5902@apple.com>
Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com> writes:
> On Nov 17, 2004, at 1:58 AM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
> > I wanted to ask what the current status of Objective-C++ for
> > mainline gcc is. While there have been a lot of activity on the
> > gcc-patches and gcc-cvs lists several month ago it is now relatively
> > silent regarding this topic. Is all the work done now or did the
> > release plan slip backwards (to 4.1 or whatever)?
>
> Last I knew, everything was solidly wedged behind Geoff's objection
> with no plan forward. The objection will either have to be withdrawn,
> or Geoff will have to communicate his vision before any progress can
> be made.
Zem is asking me to design his frontend's data structures for him. I
don't have time to do that right now, and Zem hasn't done the design
work himself, so we're waiting.
My last comment to Zem was:
> I still don't really know enough, but my best guess is that you
> should put an extra field in the lang_type structure for C, and in
> lang_type_class for C++. Try that and let me know how it goes.
and so far as I know, he hasn't tried it yet.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-18 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-17 10:28 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 20:51 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-17 21:53 ` Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 22:28 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-17 22:54 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-17 23:02 ` Nicolas Roard
2004-11-17 23:31 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-17 23:17 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-17 23:50 ` Alex Perez
2004-11-18 0:06 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-18 0:35 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:46 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-18 1:18 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-18 23:22 ` Geoffrey Keating [this message]
2004-11-18 23:28 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 0:57 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 1:26 ` Rogelio Serrano
2004-11-19 1:41 ` Helge Hess
2004-11-19 4:26 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 5:49 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-19 6:42 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 7:52 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 3:22 ` Chuck Robey
2004-11-22 10:07 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 10:31 ` Ranjit Mathew
2004-11-19 19:44 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-19 20:04 ` Dan Grillo
2004-11-19 20:08 ` Dave Korn
2004-11-19 13:31 Richard Kenner
2004-11-19 20:22 ` Ziemowit Laski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2is82okds.fsf@greed.local \
--to=geoffk@geoffk.org \
--cc=discuss-gnustep@gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mrs@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).