public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
To: Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2is82okds.fsf@greed.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C949FF38-2681-48A5-94D9-0228551C5902@apple.com>

Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com> writes:

> On Nov 17, 2004, at 1:58 AM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
> > I wanted to ask what the current status of Objective-C++ for
> > mainline gcc is. While there have been a lot of activity on the
> > gcc-patches and gcc-cvs lists several month ago it is now relatively
> > silent regarding this topic. Is all the work done now or did the
> > release plan slip backwards (to 4.1 or whatever)?
> 
> Last I knew, everything was solidly wedged behind Geoff's objection
> with no plan forward.  The objection will either have to be withdrawn,
> or Geoff will have to communicate his vision before any progress can
> be made.

Zem is asking me to design his frontend's data structures for him.  I
don't have time to do that right now, and Zem hasn't done the design
work himself, so we're waiting.

My last comment to Zem was:

> I still don't really know enough, but my best guess is that you
> should put an extra field in the lang_type structure for C, and in
> lang_type_class for C++.  Try that and let me know how it goes.

and so far as I know, he hasn't tried it yet.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-11-18 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-17 10:28 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 20:51 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-17 21:53   ` Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 22:28     ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-17 22:54     ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-17 23:02       ` Nicolas Roard
2004-11-17 23:31         ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-17 23:17       ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-17 23:50         ` Alex Perez
2004-11-18  0:06           ` Joe Buck
2004-11-18  0:35         ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18  0:46           ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18  0:53   ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-18  1:18     ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-18 23:22   ` Geoffrey Keating [this message]
2004-11-18 23:28     ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19  0:57     ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19  1:26       ` Rogelio Serrano
2004-11-19  1:41       ` Helge Hess
2004-11-19  4:26         ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19  5:49         ` Matt Austern
2004-11-19  6:42           ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19  7:52             ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22  3:22               ` Chuck Robey
2004-11-22 10:07                 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 10:31                 ` Ranjit Mathew
2004-11-19 19:44           ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-19 20:04             ` Dan Grillo
2004-11-19 20:08             ` Dave Korn
2004-11-19 13:31 Richard Kenner
2004-11-19 20:22 ` Ziemowit Laski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2is82okds.fsf@greed.local \
    --to=geoffk@geoffk.org \
    --cc=discuss-gnustep@gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=mrs@apple.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).