From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11942 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2011 09:11:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 11873 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2011 09:11:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (HELO mail-out.m-online.net) (212.18.0.9) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:11:11 +0000 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724C91C1DA13; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:11:08 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: xTX0QFcwS5mADp8wOvDzTZKdDjaqd7XwSk9cgbDhn08= Received: from linux.local (ppp-93-104-146-11.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.146.11]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2AFE71C0024A; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:11:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0CB401E52EF; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:11:06 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Revital1 Eres Cc: Richard Earnshaw , Ayal Zaks , cltang@codesourcery.com, dm@ispras.ru, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, yao@codesourcery.com, Roman Zhuykov Subject: Re: [ARM] Implementing doloop pattern References: <4D1C915C.10001@ispras.ru> <1294241704.7406.12.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> X-Yow: If I pull this SWITCH I'll be RITA HAYWORTH!! Or a SCIENTOLOGIST! Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Revital's message of "Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:59:08 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 Revital1 Eres writes: > Index: loop-doloop.c > =================================================================== > --- loop-doloop.c (revision 168397) > +++ loop-doloop.c (working copy) > + /* The third case: the compre and decrement instructions s/compre/compare/. > Index: config/arm/thumb2.md > =================================================================== > --- config/arm/thumb2.md (revision 168424) > +++ config/arm/thumb2.md (working copy) > + ??? The possible introduction of a new block to initialize the > + new IV can potentially effects branch optimizations. */ s/effects/effect/ Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."