From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32449 invoked by alias); 17 May 2002 01:57:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32396 invoked from network); 17 May 2002 01:57:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 May 2002 01:57:41 -0000 Received: from culebra.cygnus.com (taarna.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.230.102]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA19324; Thu, 16 May 2002 18:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from aldyh@localhost) by culebra.cygnus.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) id g4H1usl18775; Fri, 17 May 2002 11:56:54 +1000 (EST) To: Mark Mitchell Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Branch References: <152250000.1021510337@gandalf.codesourcery.com> From: Aldy Hernandez Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 21:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Mark Mitchell's message of "Wed, 15 May 2002 17:52:17 -0700" Message-ID: X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg01423.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell writes: > c) they add support for new platforms, language features, etc. > that we did not support before -- and that we cannot, therefore, > be regressing. Great. I'd like permission to check in my cleanups to the user level include file: There are some major fixes without which, altivec support isn't going to be very useful. Aldy