From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-65611-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6147 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2003 10:33:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6132 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2003 10:33:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 3 Jan 2003 10:33:17 -0000
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18UP7Z-0003Ec-00
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 11:32:09 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18UP7Z-0003ET-00
	for <gmane-comp-gcc-devel@m.gmane.org>; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 11:32:09 +0100
Path: not-for-mail
From: Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: GCC still getting a lot slower
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 10:33:00 -0000
Organization: Red Hat Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd
Message-ID: <m31y3ucylb.fsf@scooby.brisbane.redhat.com>
References: <20021231214116.GA1953@doctormoo> <Pine.BSF.4.51.0301021148470.62618@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20030102142107.GA21227@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter)
Cache-Post-Path: webdevap.brisbane.redhat.com!unknown@scooby.brisbane.redhat.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:

  >> > Can we test compile time change of some *fixed* piece of code,
  >> > perhaps?

  Jan> For C++ I am not aware of something like that.

We have found SID to be a good test case for the C++ compiler (see
http://sources.redhat.com/sid).

Ben