From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-103879-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19340 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2004 21:14:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19331 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2004 21:14:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mirapoint2.tis.cwru.edu) (129.22.104.47)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Oct 2004 21:14:50 -0000
Received: from multivac.cwru.edu (multivac.ITS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.114.26])
	by mirapoint2.tis.cwru.edu (MOS 3.4.3-CR)
	with SMTP id CIK62571;
	Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:14:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 3069 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2004 21:15:08 -0000
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>, Nick Ing-Simmons <nick@ing-simmons.net>,
        gcc@gcc.gnu.org, "'Morten Welinder'" <terra@gnome.org>,
        Dave Korn <dk@artimi.com>
Subject: Re: signed vs unsigned pointer warning
In-Reply-To: <20041008205912.GA16038@mail.shareable.org> (Jamie Lokier's
	message of "Fri, 8 Oct 2004 21:59:12 +0100")
References: <20040922161751.B4F6A1422D53@darter.rentec.com>
	<NUTMEGODkUqESudbgsy00000021@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
	<20040926192142.GA29842@mail.shareable.org>
	<20040926192142.GA29842@mail.shareable.org>
	<20041008130623.9516.4@llama.elixent.com>
	<20041008091714.A1695@synopsys.com> <m3d5zttbu6.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<20041008100853.A2207@synopsys.com> <m3mzyxgkil.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<20041008205912.GA16038@mail.shareable.org>
From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc)
Organization: What did you have in mind?  A short, blunt, human pyramid?
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Mail-Followup-To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, Joe Buck
	<Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>, Nick Ing-Simmons <nick@ing-simmons.net>,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org, "'Morten Welinder'" <terra@gnome.org>, Dave Korn
	<dk@artimi.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 08:48:00 -0000
Message-ID: <m33c0ohpyb.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00377.txt.bz2

Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> wrote:
> Or is there a rule that is*(EOF) must return 0?

Yes.  The standard specifies the result of each is* macro to be 1 iff
the argument is a certain kind of character.  EOF is not any kind of
character.


paul