From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16372 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2003 13:51:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16362 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2003 13:51:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO uniton.integrable-solutions.net) (62.212.99.186) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2003 13:51:29 -0000 Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h6UDp3Su021716; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:51:03 +0200 Received: (from gdr@localhost) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h6UDp3iA021715; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:51:03 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: uniton.integrable-solutions.net: gdr set sender to gdr@integrable-solutions.net using -f To: Richard Guenther Cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Karel Gardas , Alexandre Oliva , Subject: Re: std::pow implementation References: From: Gabriel Dos Reis In-Reply-To: Organization: Integrable Solutions Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg02160.txt.bz2 Richard Guenther writes: | > | With Gaby's suggested interpretation, the compiler has *no* choice; it | > | must obey the inlining constraint because the programmer always knows | > | better... Even when prepared to admit that he doesn't. | > | > That assertion is wrong. | | Which one? That the compiler has no choice? Mostly. See my answer to (the other) Richard. -- Gaby