From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1333 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2002 23:46:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1299 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2002 23:46:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO uniton.integrable-solutions.net) (62.212.99.186) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2002 23:46:33 -0000 Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id gBHNeLtv018876; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:40:21 +0100 Received: (from gdr@localhost) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gBHNeKSU018875; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:40:20 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: uniton.integrable-solutions.net: gdr set sender to gdr@integrable-solutions.net using -f To: Richard Henderson Cc: Jan Hubicka , Neil Booth , David Edelsohn , Zack Weinberg , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: basic-improvements merge status References: <87bs3l3ab5.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <200212162212.RAA27306@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20021216221828.GB3138@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20021216222324.GA511@daikokuya.co.uk> <20021216230448.GJ3138@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20021217233955.GB2188@redhat.com> From: Gabriel Dos Reis In-Reply-To: <20021217233955.GB2188@redhat.com> Organization: Integrable Solutions Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01089.txt.bz2 Richard Henderson writes: [...] | > Since it doesn't, because there no library support with | > it), it is *wrong* to assume it is operating in C99 mode. | | On the other hand, if you don't have a c99-compliant library, | I wonder if you should be using -std=c99 at all. No body was using -std=c99 when building libstdc++-v3. -- Gaby