From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23151 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2004 17:02:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23139 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2004 17:02:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (209.128.65.135) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2004 17:02:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 32644 invoked by uid 10); 12 Mar 2004 17:02:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 20918 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2004 17:02:45 -0000 From: Ian Lance Taylor To: Kelley Cook Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0 References: <4051EA5B.2070008@ford.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4051EA5B.2070008@ford.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00570.txt.bz2 Kelley Cook writes: > The GCC website uses cvsweb 1.93 which was a nice stable and old release. > > FreeBSD-CVSweb is currently at version 3.0 and offers many compelling > features including: > > automatic tarball/zipball creation > automatic PR xxxxx linking > automatic filename linking > syntax highlighting > > The first one alone seems reason enough to upgrade as it would provide > an alternative for those stuck behind firewalls who are chirping for > "more snapshots! more snapshots!" The place to suggest this is overseers@gcc.gnu.org. My reaction to automatic tarball/zipball creation is "machine overload! machine overload!" I think we would definitely want to disable that feature if we bring in the new cvsweb. Ian