public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
To: Denis Chertykov <denisc@overta.ru>
Cc: Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: CAN_ELIMINATE question
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3accsuqtc.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lkwfgjni.fsf@overta.ru>

Denis Chertykov <denisc@overta.ru> writes:

> Code fragment from reload1.c: reload()
> ----------------------------------------------------
>       if (caller_save_needed)
> 	setup_save_areas ();
> 
>       /* If we allocated another stack slot, redo elimination bookkeeping.  */
>       if (starting_frame_size != get_frame_size ())
> 	continue;
> 
>       if (caller_save_needed)
> 	{
> 	  save_call_clobbered_regs ();
> 	  /* That might have allocated new insn_chain structures.  */
> 	  reload_firstobj = obstack_alloc (&reload_obstack, 0);
> 	}
> 
>       calculate_needs_all_insns (global);
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
> Call to setup_save_areas () can change frame size but only offsets on
> eliminable registers will be changed before call to calculate_needs_all_insns.
> calculate_needs_all_insns will calculate wrong needs for elimination.
> 
> Example for AVR:
> 
> avr target can eliminate fp -> sp only if get_frame_size () == 0.
> 
> Before call to setup_save_areas() frame size was 0 (CAN_ELIMINATE (FP,SP) != 0)
> 
> setup_save_areas() increase frame size.
> set_initial_elim_offsets() correct offsets but can_eliminate isn't changed.
> 
> save_call_clobbered_regs () emit save insn
> (insn 659 161 162 16 (set (mem/c:HI (plus:HI (reg/f:HI 28 r28) # it's FP
>                 (const_int 1 [0x1])) [29 S2 A8])
>         (reg:HI 24 r24)) 12 {*movhi} (nil)
>     (nil))
> 
> calculate_needs_all_insns() try to eliminate (reg/f:HI 28 r28) to SP.
> It's wrong because get_frame_size () != 0 and CAN_ELIMINATE (FP,SP) == 0

But then we'll call update_eliminables(), notice that something
changed, and go around the loop again.

There may be a bug here, but it needs more explanation.

> I think that better to call update_eliminables() somewhere after
> setup_save_areas()

Exactly.  We do that.  About 15 lines after the lines you quoted
above.

What am I missing?

Ian

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-15 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-13 15:43 Denis Chertykov
2006-02-13 17:48 ` Eric Christopher
2006-02-13 19:07   ` Denis Chertykov
2006-02-15 23:48     ` Ian Lance Taylor [this message]
2006-02-16 17:28       ` Denis Chertykov
2006-02-16 23:56         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-02-17 17:49           ` Denis Chertykov
2006-03-28 20:45             ` Denis Chertykov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3accsuqtc.fsf@gossamer.airs.com \
    --to=ian@airs.com \
    --cc=denisc@overta.ru \
    --cc=echristo@apple.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).