From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-41835-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7240 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2001 02:28:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7188 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2001 02:28:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5)
  by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2001 02:28:33 -0000
Received: from localhost.localdomain (taarna.cygnus.com [205.180.230.102])
	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA21098
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 18:28:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from aldyh@localhost)
	by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fAS2UvC07901;
	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:30:57 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: aldyh set sender to aldyh@redhat.com using -f
To: mike stump <mrs@windriver.com>
Cc: geoffk@redhat.com, ira@apple.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for  altivec)
References: <200111280212.SAA10114@kankakee.wrs.com>
From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:10:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <200111280212.SAA10114@kankakee.wrs.com>
Message-ID: <m3adx7vd7i.fsf@litecycle.cc.andrews.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00954.txt.bz2

>>>>> "mike" == mike stump <mrs@windriver.com> writes:

 > gnu::gcc::vector<int[4]> a, b;
 > vector<int> cxx_vec;

 > void foo() {
 >      a += b;
 >      cxx_vec.begin();
 > }

 > A completely trivial problem.  :-)


for the record, i'm not proposing a vector keyword-- but a __vector
keyword, to be implemented in a target independent manner.

I don't think there's any plausible way of implementing "vector" and
having it coexist with STL and a myraid of other things.  That much is
clear.

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
To: mike stump <mrs@windriver.com>
Cc: geoffk@redhat.com, ira@apple.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Target-specific Front-Ends? (Was: front end changes for  altivec)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 18:28:00 -0000
Message-ID: <m3adx7vd7i.fsf@litecycle.cc.andrews.edu>
References: <200111280212.SAA10114@kankakee.wrs.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg01455.html
Message-ID: <20011127182800.4QybJJ0Bpc5Kw2lsVrCOAGacO-WSnXRqCmEa47V1P7c@z>

>>>>> "mike" == mike stump <mrs@windriver.com> writes:

 > gnu::gcc::vector<int[4]> a, b;
 > vector<int> cxx_vec;

 > void foo() {
 >      a += b;
 >      cxx_vec.begin();
 > }

 > A completely trivial problem.  :-)


for the record, i'm not proposing a vector keyword-- but a __vector
keyword, to be implemented in a target independent manner.

I don't think there's any plausible way of implementing "vector" and
having it coexist with STL and a myraid of other things.  That much is
clear.