From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4988 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2009 14:22:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 4970 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2009 14:21:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:21:52 +0000 Received: from wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.65]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n58ELmd8010429 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:21:49 +0100 Received: from pxi30 (pxi30.prod.google.com [10.243.27.30]) by wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n58ELlv0001011 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:21:47 -0700 Received: by pxi30 with SMTP id 30so58460pxi.7 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:21:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.177.9 with SMTP id z9mr11541296wae.103.1244470906869; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:21:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.google.com (adsl-71-133-8-30.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [71.133.8.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l28sm5741998waf.19.2009.06.08.07.21.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:21:46 -0700 (PDT) To: Nicolas COLLIN Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Intermediate representation References: <4A2CFFF7.9010503@fr.thalesgroup.com> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4A2CFFF7.9010503@fr.thalesgroup.com> (Nicolas COLLIN's message of "Mon\, 08 Jun 2009 14\:11\:35 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2 Nicolas COLLIN writes: > In my version DECL_SAVED_TREE is defined as : > #define DECL_SAVED_TREE(NODE) DECL_MEMFUNC_POINTER_TO (NODE) > I just looked at DECL_MEMFUNC and it doesn't do what I want. > Then I don't know how to get the statements in the FUNCTION_DECL I got. You must be working with gcc before 4.0. I don't know what to suggest, except that it will be easier if you work with current gcc. Ian