From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 550 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2009 17:28:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 542 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2009 17:28:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:28:06 +0000 Received: from zps35.corp.google.com (zps35.corp.google.com [172.25.146.35]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n3RHRJgf031290; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:27:20 +0100 Received: from smtp.corp.google.com (spacemonkey1.corp.google.com [192.168.120.115]) by zps35.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n3RHRGWA006295 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:27:17 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain.google.com (adsl-71-133-8-30.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [71.133.8.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.corp.google.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3RHRFYP012885 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:27:16 -0700 To: okellogg@users.sourceforge.net Cc: Geert Bosch , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed References: <1239557374.7565.37.camel@tidbit.site> <1240253122.4554.64.camel@tidbit.site> <8656490A-EA10-49F3-815C-E584DA3CAE7C@adacore.com> <1240752645.5074.102.camel@tidbit.site> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1240752645.5074.102.camel@tidbit.site> (Oliver Kellogg's message of "Sun\, 26 Apr 2009 15\:30\:44 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00710.txt.bz2 oliver.kellogg@t-online.de (Oliver Kellogg) writes: > gcc has a new command line switch, "-multi". > This tells gcc to forward all given input files to a single execution > of the compiler proper, in a similar way as done for "-combine". This is good work, but why not just reuse -combine? What is the difference btween -multi and -combine? Ian