From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@cs.tamu.edu>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Matt Austern <matt@lafstern.org>,
Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>,
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: DR handling for C++
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3d60gwth5.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <414F41F7.40306@codesourcery.com>
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| >| Unfortunately, I don't have the messages from the original thread, so
| >| I'm off starting a new thread.
| > | | I certainly agree with Matt and Nathan that there's no point in
| >| supporting C++98 separately from C++03. I also agree that new
| >
| >I don't understand this part. Are you implying that there is no point
| >for -std=c++98 behaves differently than -std=c++03 (assuming the last
| >ever existed?)?
| >
| Yes, that is what I am saying. I do not think it's worthwhile for GNU
| C++ to have a C++98 mode that is separate from a C++03 mode. Much of
| what has changed in C++03 is clarifications to C++98; in those cases,
| it's not possible to know what C++98 should have done with the code,
| because the actual C++98 standard did not say.
If we do that, then we should probably align with the library too.
Otherwise it would become a very confusing situation.
-- Gaby
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-20 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-20 20:44 Mark Mitchell
2004-09-20 20:47 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-09-20 20:55 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-09-20 21:26 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-09-20 21:00 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-20 21:04 ` Matt Austern
2004-09-20 21:08 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-20 21:36 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-20 23:42 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-21 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-09-21 8:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-09-21 12:39 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-20 20:54 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-20 21:01 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-20 21:07 ` Gabriel Dos Reis [this message]
2004-09-20 21:14 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-20 21:41 ` Matt Austern
2004-09-20 22:32 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-20 22:59 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-20 23:12 ` Matt Austern
2004-09-20 23:16 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-10-18 9:19 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3d60gwth5.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu \
--to=gdr@cs.tamu.edu \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=matt@lafstern.org \
--cc=nathan@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).