public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0
@ 2004-04-25  9:07 Stephan T. Lavavej
  2004-04-26 12:52 ` Gerald Pfeifer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephan T. Lavavej @ 2004-04-25  9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: GCC

[Andrew Pinski]
> I think it is time to remove it, people had a large amount of
> time to fix their code. This option has been here since 2.7.1
> which was back in 1995 so almost ten years.

By Stroustrup's beard, that flag must die.

Any chance of deprecating it in 3.4.1 and nuclearating it outright in
3.5.0/4.0.0?  Please?

Stephan T. Lavavej
http://nuwen.net


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* RE: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0
  2004-04-25  9:07 [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0 Stephan T. Lavavej
@ 2004-04-26 12:52 ` Gerald Pfeifer
  2004-04-26 20:16   ` Joe Buck
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2004-04-26 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephan T. Lavavej; +Cc: GCC

On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:
>> I think it is time to remove it, people had a large amount of time to
>> fix their code. This option has been here since 2.7.1 which was back in
>> 1995 so almost ten years.
> Any chance of deprecating it in 3.4.1 and nuclearating it outright in
> 3.5.0/4.0.0?  Please?

Given that 3.4 already requires most significant changes to code old
enough to require -fno-for-scope, I'm strongly in favor of that.

Gerald
-- 
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry)   gerald@pfeifer.com   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0
  2004-04-26 12:52 ` Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2004-04-26 20:16   ` Joe Buck
  2004-04-27  7:21     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2004-04-26 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: Stephan T. Lavavej, GCC

On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 09:59:32AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:
> >> I think it is time to remove it, people had a large amount of time to
> >> fix their code. This option has been here since 2.7.1 which was back in
> >> 1995 so almost ten years.
> > Any chance of deprecating it in 3.4.1 and nuclearating it outright in
> > 3.5.0/4.0.0?  Please?
> 
> Given that 3.4 already requires most significant changes to code old
> enough to require -fno-for-scope, I'm strongly in favor of that.

I'd be happy for g++ to dump -fno-for-scope.  I regret that we haven't
already done it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0
  2004-04-26 20:16   ` Joe Buck
@ 2004-04-27  7:21     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Dos Reis @ 2004-04-27  7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Buck; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer, Stephan T. Lavavej, GCC

Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> writes:

| On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 09:59:32AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
| > On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:
| > >> I think it is time to remove it, people had a large amount of time to
| > >> fix their code. This option has been here since 2.7.1 which was back in
| > >> 1995 so almost ten years.
| > > Any chance of deprecating it in 3.4.1 and nuclearating it outright in
| > > 3.5.0/4.0.0?  Please?
| > 
| > Given that 3.4 already requires most significant changes to code old
| > enough to require -fno-for-scope, I'm strongly in favor of that.
| 
| I'd be happy for g++ to dump -fno-for-scope.

I'm of that opinion too.

-- Gaby

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0
  2004-04-27 16:16 ` Mike Stump
@ 2004-04-28  4:52   ` Mark Mitchell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Mitchell @ 2004-04-28  4:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Stump; +Cc: Andrew Pinski, gcc@gcc.gnu.org list

Mike Stump wrote:

> On Saturday, April 24, 2004, at 07:08  PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
>> I think it is time to remove it
>
I'll approve a patch to remove -fno-for-scope.  Not pre-approve, though; 
just approve: when you're done, copy me on it, and I'll review it.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0
  2004-04-25  8:50 Andrew Pinski
@ 2004-04-27 16:16 ` Mike Stump
  2004-04-28  4:52   ` Mark Mitchell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mike Stump @ 2004-04-27 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Pinski; +Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org list

On Saturday, April 24, 2004, at 07:08  PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I think it is time to remove it

Just be sure to get all the bits out if you can...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0
@ 2004-04-25  8:50 Andrew Pinski
  2004-04-27 16:16 ` Mike Stump
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2004-04-25  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org list; +Cc: Andrew Pinski

It has been a long time since this option was added to support old ARM 
C++ code.
I think it is time to remove it, people had a large amount of time to 
fix their
code.  This option has been here since 2.7.1 which was back in 1995 so 
almost
ten years.  We only get one or two bug reports about this flag and 
libstdc++ per
release which I think is a maintainer burden.

Does anyone have any objections?

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-28  3:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-25  9:07 [C++] Deprecating -fno-for-scope for 3.5.0 Stephan T. Lavavej
2004-04-26 12:52 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2004-04-26 20:16   ` Joe Buck
2004-04-27  7:21     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-25  8:50 Andrew Pinski
2004-04-27 16:16 ` Mike Stump
2004-04-28  4:52   ` Mark Mitchell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).