public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86)
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3fyut3sv1.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42CAE536.7010303@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| 
| >If you regard the object representation as an array of bytes, does it
| >take long realize it is not much different from hashing a character
| >string?
| >
| It takes less if your proposal comes together with a specific one for
| character string hashing:

You do have one already.  Start from there.  Measure, then we can
argue later.  Now that you realize it is same issue, we've made
significant progress. 

[...]

| involved. For example, I'm not at all sure that the hash function
| suggested by submitter of 21193 would also work statistically well for
| floats (note that most of the real world succesful applications
| mentioned in the linked web page are about *real* text). I don't think

Yes, but note also that those depend on some assumptions about
the distribution of some words.  Not every specific context would
equally benefit from that.  The point being that once you
have reduced the problem to one previously known solved problem,
it is only a matter of arguing about little details.  I think
that is far better than current situation.

-- Gaby

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-05 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-05 13:05 Michael Veksler
2005-07-05 13:32 ` Paolo Carlini
2005-07-05 15:43   ` Michael Veksler
2005-07-05 15:57     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-05 16:04       ` Paolo Carlini
2005-07-05 20:18         ` Michael Veksler
2005-07-05 20:22           ` Paolo Carlini
2005-07-05 20:36     ` Michael Veksler
2005-07-05 20:41       ` Paolo Carlini
2005-07-05 20:47         ` Paolo Carlini
2005-07-05 21:12           ` Michael Veksler
2005-07-05 21:21       ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-05 14:28 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-05 17:04 ` Paolo Carlini
2005-07-05 18:06   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-05 18:10     ` Joe Buck
2005-07-05 18:32       ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-05 18:42         ` Paolo Carlini
2005-07-05 19:18           ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-05 19:52             ` Paolo Carlini
2005-07-05 20:24               ` Gabriel Dos Reis [this message]
2005-07-05 19:01       ` Michael Veksler
2005-07-05 19:24         ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-06 12:38     ` Avi Kivity
2005-07-06 12:54       ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-06 12:54       ` Michael Veksler
2005-07-06 13:01         ` Avi Kivity
2005-07-06 13:50           ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-07-05 18:08   ` Joe Buck
2005-07-05 18:12     ` Paolo Carlini
2005-07-05 19:58       ` Joe Buck
2005-07-05 19:59         ` Paolo Carlini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3fyut3sv1.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net \
    --to=gdr@integrable-solutions.net \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).