From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26004 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2002 23:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25996 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2002 23:08:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Sep 2002 23:08:26 -0000 Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17pzY2-0002c2-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 19:08:26 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17pzY0-0006rK-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 19:08:25 -0400 Received: from 042.dsl6660142.ftth.surewest.net ([66.60.142.42]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17pzY0-0006rD-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 19:08:24 -0400 Received: (from anguiano@localhost) by 042.dsl6660142.ftth.surewest.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8DN8Hp20553; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:08:18 -0700 To: Richard Henderson Cc: gcc@gnu.org, gcc-discuss@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: CATCH_ALL_TYPE? References: <20020904164413.GC9505@redhat.com> From: Ricardo Anguiano In-Reply-To: <20020904164413.GC9505@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2 Richard Henderson writes: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 07:29:45PM -0700, Ricardo Anguiano wrote: > > If CATCH_ALL_TYPE has gone away, what has taken it's place? > > Presumably you mean in the context of catching exceptions? > NULL_TREE. Yes, that was what I was looking for. Thanks. -Ricardo