From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-156326-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12915 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2009 22:26:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 12906 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2009 22:26:43 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:26:34 +0000
Received: from zps37.corp.google.com (zps37.corp.google.com [172.25.146.37]) 	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n81MQUQP005189 	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 23:26:31 +0100
Received: from ewy24 (ewy24.prod.google.com [10.241.103.24]) 	by zps37.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n81MQRlZ011654 	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:26:28 -0700
Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so286083ewy.23         for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.210.101.10 with SMTP id y10mr7798391ebb.60.1251843987285;         Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain.google.com (dhcp-172-22-126-192.mtv.corp.google.com [172.22.126.192])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm189093eyx.21.2009.09.01.15.26.24         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jean Christophe Beyler <jean.christophe.beyler@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Replacing certain operations with function calls
References: <c568a2600909010727y77c5a7b8vbb7d5e36192cd677@mail.gmail.com> 	<m3bpluoc7g.fsf@google.com> 	<c568a2600909011130r581f452dg865a3a214a97ce10@mail.gmail.com> 	<c568a2600909011520r7d95997co2da270aed2e4bf6e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:26:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <c568a2600909011520r7d95997co2da270aed2e4bf6e@mail.gmail.com> (Jean Christophe Beyler's message of "Tue\, 1 Sep 2009 18\:20\:06 -0400")
Message-ID: <m3k50il2sy.fsf@google.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2

Jean Christophe Beyler <jean.christophe.beyler@gmail.com> writes:

> First off: does this seem correct?

Awkward though it is, it may be more reliable to build a small tree here
and pass it to expand_call.  This assumes that you want to use the
standard ABI when calling this function.

Then your second issue would go away.

Ian