From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-116074-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17418 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2005 02:05:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17339 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jun 2005 02:05:18 -0000
Received: from smtp-100-sunday.nerim.net (HELO kraid.nerim.net) (62.4.16.100)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 02:05:18 +0000
Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (gdr.net1.nerim.net [62.212.99.186])
	by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428A240E22;
	Sun, 19 Jun 2005 04:05:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j5J25KKY024552;
	Sun, 19 Jun 2005 04:05:20 +0200
Received: (from gdr@localhost)
	by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j5J25KLa024551;
	Sun, 19 Jun 2005 04:05:20 +0200
To: Tommy Vercetti <vercetti@zlew.org>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/c++ validator
References: <200506190024.18033@gj-laptop> <200506190038.07506@gj-laptop>
	<m3y897i2ep.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
	<200506190344.07131@gj-laptop>
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
In-Reply-To: <200506190344.07131@gj-laptop>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 02:05:00 -0000
Message-ID: <m3k6krhzj4.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00785.txt.bz2

Tommy Vercetti <vercetti@zlew.org> writes:

| On Sunday 19 June 2005 03:03, you wrote:
| > Tommy Vercetti <vercetti@zlew.org> writes:
| > | On Sunday 19 June 2005 00:32, you wrote:
| > | > Something like:
| > | >
| > | > http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~gregod/STLlint/STLlint.html
| > |
| > | Yeah, but for more than just STL, and opensource. C++ checker that
| > | is going to work for instance for KDE.
| > |  Wonder why they use proprietary parser,
| >
| > maybe because they work? ;-p
| 
| > | there are opensource
| > | parsers around,  like elsa, or gcc c++ parser.
| >
| > Elsa does not parse C++.
| Elsa is for C/C++, so it says on their website.

I know what the website says.  My comment was about the actual *uses*
of the parser.  Have you tried it on actual C++ programs? 

-- Gaby