From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13787 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2003 07:40:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13779 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2003 07:40:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO uniton.integrable-solutions.net) (62.212.99.186) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2003 07:40:37 -0000 Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h3N7YoH2023779; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:34:51 +0200 Received: (from gdr@localhost) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h3N7YoFY023778; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:34:50 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: uniton.integrable-solutions.net: gdr set sender to gdr@integrable-solutions.net using -f To: Phil Edwards Cc: Daniel Berlin , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches References: <398380F8-755C-11D7-9B52-000A95A34564@dberlin.org> <20030423072625.GA29131@disaster.jaj.com> From: Gabriel Dos Reis In-Reply-To: <20030423072625.GA29131@disaster.jaj.com> Organization: Integrable Solutions Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01133.txt.bz2 Phil Edwards writes: | It's just sh, most of them are. I wouldn't want to see them rewritten | in perl, to be honest. And most of them that do use sh are pretty | straightforward. The primary goal of my original message isn't about rewriting anything in whatever language. I'm just asking for opinions about not bumping gcc/version.c on old and/or closed branches. Rewriting is a separate issue and I'm not sure it was really proposed. -- Gaby