From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5990 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 04:46:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5983 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 04:46:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO uniton.integrable-solutions.net) (62.212.99.186) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 04:46:10 -0000 Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i0J4dg9b006612; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 05:39:42 +0100 Received: (from gdr@localhost) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id i0J4dfW6006611; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 05:39:41 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: uniton.integrable-solutions.net: gdr set sender to gdr@integrable-solutions.net using -f To: "Giovanni Bajo" Cc: "Marc Espie" , Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal References: <90200277-4301-11D8-BDBD-000A95B1F520@apple.com> <20040110002526.GA13568@disaster.jaj.com> <82D6F34E-4306-11D8-BDBD-000A95B1F520@apple.com> <20040110154129.GA28152@disaster.jaj.com> <1073935323.3458.42.camel@minax.codesourcery.com> <1073951351.3458.162.camel@minax.codesourcery.com> <20040119013113.044D74895@quatramaran.ens.fr> <24a301c3de45$ed34dc40$34b82997@bagio> From: Gabriel Dos Reis In-Reply-To: <24a301c3de45$ed34dc40$34b82997@bagio> Organization: Integrable Solutions Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 04:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01239.txt.bz2 "Giovanni Bajo" writes: | Testcases would help. We seriously do care about all the compile-time | regressions we have in bugzilla, but we have just a few of | them. People should really file bugreports about it. Strongly seconded. In private, I've told Marc that the more people complain (i.e. filling reports) about their being bitten by compile-time perforamnce, the more it is likely that GCC developers will eventually care about it. -- Gaby